# Adversarial Defense in Vision-Language Models: An Overview

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.12443 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.12443/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 10 of its 11 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 18 Jan 2026.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/mllm-jailbreaks-and-adversarial-robustness/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.06083/) (2017)
- [Understanding Zero-Shot Adversarial Robustness for Large-Scale Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.07016/) (2022)
- [One Prompt Word is Enough to Boost Adversarial Robustness for Pre-trained Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.01849/) (2024)
- [R-TPT: Improving Adversarial Robustness of Vision-Language Models through Test-Time Prompt Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.11195/) (2025)
- [Revisiting the Adversarial Robustness of Vision Language Models: a Multimodal Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.19287/) (2024)
- [Text-Guided Attention is All You Need for Zero-Shot Robustness in Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.21802/) (2024)
- [TAPT: Test-Time Adversarial Prompt Tuning for Robust Inference in Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.13136/) (2024)
- [CLIPure: Purification in Latent Space via CLIP for Adversarially Robust Zero-Shot Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.18176/) (2025)
- [Double Visual Defense: Adversarial Pre-training and Instruction Tuning for Improving Vision-Language Model Robustness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.09446/) (2025)
- [Meta Invariance Defense Towards Generalizable Robustness to Unknown Adversarial Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.03340/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Automatic Hard Example Synthesis with Multi-Level Agentic Data Curation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.14256/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The widespread use of Vision Language Models (VLMs, e.g. CLIP) has raised concerns about their vulnerability to sophisticated and imperceptible adversarial attacks. These attacks could compromise model performance and system security in cross-modal tasks. To address this challenge, three main defense paradigms have been proposed: Training-time Defense, Test-time Adaptation Defense, and Training-free Defense. Training-time Defense involves modifying the training process, typically through adversarial fine-tuning to improve the robustness to adversarial examples. While effective, this approach requires substantial computational resources and may not generalize across all adversarial attacks. Test-time Adaptation Defense focuses on adapting the model at inference time by updating its parameters to handle unlabeled adversarial examples, offering flexibility but often at the cost of increased complexity and computational overhead. Training-free Defense avoids modifying the model itself, instead focusing on altering the adversarial inputs or their feature embeddings, which enforces input perturbations to mitigate the impact of attacks without additional training. This survey reviews the latest advancements in adversarial defense strategies for VLMs, highlighting the strengths and limitations of such approaches and discussing ongoing challenges in enhancing the robustness of VLMs.