# Acting Flatterers via LLMs Sycophancy: Combating Clickbait with LLMs Opposing-Stance Reasoning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.12019 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.12019/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Causal reasoning in LLMs, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 17 of its 47 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 Jan 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Causal reasoning in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/lr/causal-reasoning-in-llms/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.11942/) (2019)
- [Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.13548/) (2023)
- [DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.19437/) (2024)
- [TrustLLM: Trustworthiness in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.05561/) (2024)
- [Simple synthetic data reduces sycophancy in large language models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.03958/) (2023)
- [Sycophancy to Subterfuge: Investigating Reward-Tampering in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.10162/) (2024)
- [CodeElo: Benchmarking Competition-level Code Generation of LLMs with Human-comparable Elo Ratings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.01257/) (2025)
- [Sycophancy in Large Language Models: Causes and Mitigations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.15287/) (2024)
- [From Yes-Men to Truth-Tellers: Addressing Sycophancy in Large Language Models with Pinpoint Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.01658/) (2024)
- [Sycophancy in Vision-Language Models: A Systematic Analysis and an Inference-Time Mitigation Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.11261/) (2024)
- [Plancraft: an evaluation dataset for planning with LLM agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.21033/) (2024)
- [SHARP: Unlocking Interactive Hallucination via Stance Transfer in Role-Playing LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.07965/) (2024)
- [Mitigating Sycophancy in Decoder-Only Transformer Architectures: Synthetic Data Intervention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.10156/) (2024)
- [Prompt-tuning for Clickbait Detection via Text Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.11206/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Explainable Novel Category Discovery in Semantic Concept Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.04548/) (2026)
- [Mechanistic Interpretability of LLM Jailbreaks via Internal Attribution Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.07903/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The widespread proliferation of online content has intensified concerns about clickbait, deceptive or exaggerated headlines designed to attract attention. While Large Language Models (LLMs) offer a promising avenue for addressing this issue, their effectiveness is often hindered by Sycophancy, a tendency to produce reasoning that matches users' beliefs over truthful ones, which deviates from instruction-following principles. Rather than treating sycophancy as a flaw to be eliminated, this work proposes a novel approach that initially harnesses this behavior to generate contrastive reasoning from opposing perspectives. Specifically, we design a Self-renewal Opposing-stance Reasoning Generation (SORG) framework that prompts LLMs to produce high-quality agree and disagree reasoning pairs for a given news title without requiring ground-truth labels. To utilize the generated reasoning, we develop a local Opposing Reasoning-based Clickbait Detection (ORCD) model that integrates three BERT encoders to represent the title and its associated reasoning. The model leverages contrastive learning, guided by soft labels derived from LLM-generated credibility scores, to enhance detection robustness. Experimental evaluations on three benchmark datasets demonstrate that our method consistently outperforms LLM prompting, fine-tuned smaller language models, and state-of-the-art clickbait detection baselines.