# Evaluating Self-Correcting Vision Agents Through Quantitative and Qualitative Metrics

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.11637 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.11637/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Multimodal and embodied agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 13 of its 16 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Jan 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Multimodal and embodied agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/multimodal-and-embodied-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 13 of 13)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [Segment Anything](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.02643/) (2023)
- [Visual Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.08485/) (2023)
- [You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.02640/) (2015)
- [ViLBERT: Pretraining Task-Agnostic Visiolinguistic Representations for Vision-and-Language Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.02265/) (2019)
- [LXMERT: Learning Cross-Modality Encoder Representations from Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.07490/) (2019)
- [HuggingGPT: Solving AI Tasks with ChatGPT and its Friends in Hugging Face](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17580/) (2023)
- [Inner Monologue: Embodied Reasoning through Planning with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.05608/) (2022)
- [ViperGPT: Visual Inference via Python Execution for Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08128/) (2023)
- [Socratic Models: Composing Zero-Shot Multimodal Reasoning with Language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.00598/) (2022)
- [Visual Dialog](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.08669/) (2016)
- [Self-Correction is More than Refinement: A Learning Framework for Visual and Language Reasoning Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.04055/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [VisAudit: Evaluating Multimodal Agents for Visual Diagnosis and Repair](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.02399/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Recent progress in multimodal foundation models has enabled Vision-Language Agents (VLAs) to decompose complex visual tasks into executable tool-based plans. While recent benchmarks have begun to evaluate iterative self-correction, its quantitative limits and dominant reasoning bottlenecks remain poorly characterized. This work introduces a Diagnostic Micro-Benchmark. Our analysis decouples Task Success Rate (TSR = 62 percent) from Correction Success Rate (CSR = 25 to 33 percent), revealing that initial competence does not predict repair ability. We explicitly quantify the diminishing returns of correction, which saturates after three retries. Our Failure Taxonomy reveals a frequent factor is Semantic Drift (about 28 percent of failures), a loss of contextual state. By isolating this reasoning bottleneck, this benchmark defines a reproducible framework toward stateful, trustworthy multimodal agents.