# Overview of the SciHigh Track at FIRE 2025: Research Highlight Generation from Scientific Papers

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.11582 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.11582/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 7 of its 20 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 Jan 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.3215/) (2014)
- [Deep contextualized word representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.05365/) (2018)
- [Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.04368/) (2017)
- [A Supervised Approach to Extractive Summarisation of Scientific Papers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03946/) (2017)
- [Generation of Highlights from Research Papers Using Pointer-Generator Networks and SciBERT Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.07729/) (2023)
- [Named Entity Recognition Based Automatic Generation of Research Highlights](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.12795/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

`SciHigh: Research Highlight Generation from Scientific Papers' focuses on the task of automatically generating concise, informative, and meaningful bullet-point highlights directly from scientific abstracts. The goal of this task is to evaluate how effectively computational models can generate highlights that capture the key contributions, findings, and novelty of a paper in a concise form. Highlights help readers grasp essential ideas quickly and are often easier to read and understand than longer paragraphs, especially on mobile devices. The track uses the MixSub dataset cite10172215, which provides pairs of abstracts and corresponding author-written highlights. In this inaugural edition of the track, 12 teams participated, exploring various approaches, including pre-trained language models, to generate highlights from this scientific dataset. All submissions were evaluated using established metrics such as ROUGE, METEOR, and BERTScore to measure both alignment with author-written highlights and overall informativeness. Teams were ranked based on ROUGE-L scores. The findings suggest that automatically generated highlights can reduce reading effort, accelerate literature reviews, and enhance metadata for digital libraries and academic search platforms. SciHigh provides a dedicated benchmark for advancing methods aimed at concise and accurate highlight generation from scientific writing.