# Benchmarking Post-Training Quantization of Large Language Models under Microscaling Floating Point Formats

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.09555 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.09555/

## Key facts

- Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 24 of its 44 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Jan 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 24 of 24)

- [Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.06180/) (2023)
- [Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.05457/) (2018)
- [Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12191/) (2024)
- [HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.07830/) (2019)
- [Let's Verify Step by Step](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.20050/) (2023)
- [Pointer Sentinel Mixture Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.07843/) (2016)
- [PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.11641/) (2019)
- [MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.16502/) (2023)
- [GPTQ: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Generative Pre-trained Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.17323/) (2022)
- [Towards VQA Models That Can Read](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.08920/) (2019)
- [ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.10244/) (2022)
- [AWQ: Activation-aware Weight Quantization for LLM Compression and Acceleration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.00978/) (2023)
- [QuaRot: Outlier-Free 4-Bit Inference in Rotated LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.00456/) (2024)
- [A White Paper on Neural Network Quantization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.08295/) (2021)
- [SpinQuant: LLM quantization with learned rotations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.16406/) (2024)
- [SVDQuant: Absorbing Outliers by Low-Rank Components for 4-Bit Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.05007/) (2024)
- [DuQuant: Distributing Outliers via Dual Transformation Makes Stronger Quantized LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.01721/) (2024)
- [Quantization Hurts Reasoning? An Empirical Study on Quantized Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.04823/) (2025)
- ["Give Me BF16 or Give Me Death"? Accuracy-Performance Trade-Offs in LLM Quantization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.02355/) (2024)
- [Bridging the Gap Between Promise and Performance for Microscaling FP4 Quantization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.23202/) (2025)
- [Recipes for Pre-training LLMs with MXFP8](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.08027/) (2025)
- [Oscillation-Reduced MXFP4 Training for Vision Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.20853/) (2025)
- [Block Rotation is All You Need for MXFP4 Quantization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.04214/) (2025)
- [SalQ-VLM: Fine-Grained Saliency-Guided Quantization for Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.03351/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [What Makes Low-Bit Quantization-Aware Training Work for Reasoning LLMs? A Systematic Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.14888/) (2026)
- [BATQuant: Outlier-resilient MXFP4 Quantization via Learnable Block-wise Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.16590/) (2026)
- [SOAR: Scale Optimization for Accurate Reconstruction in NVFP4 Quantization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.12245/) (2026)
- [The Illusion of Equivalency: Statistical Characterization of Quantization Effects in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.08734/) (2026)
- [Quantizing Recursive Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.16237/) (2026)
- [FOCUS: FP4 Optimization via Coupled-Relaxation and Dual-Granularity Scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.01847/) (2026)
- [QuantClaw: Precision Where It Matters for OpenClaw](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.22577/) (2026)
- [Why Does Post-Training Quantization Work?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.11716/) (2026)
- [Transforms for LLM Quantization: The Great Inversion and Format Co-Design](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.25188/) (2026)
- [Predicting Quantization Price for Selecting PTQ Configurations Before Deployment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.28270/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Microscaling Floating-Point (MXFP) has emerged as a promising low-precision format for large language models (LLMs). Despite various post-training quantization (PTQ) algorithms being proposed, they mostly focus on integer quantization, while their applicability and behavior under MXFP formats remain largely unexplored. To address this gap, this work conducts a systematic investigation of PTQ under MXFP formats, encompassing over 7 PTQ algorithms, 15 evaluation benchmarks, and 3 LLM families. The key findings include: 1) MXFP8 consistently achieves near-lossless performance, while MXFP4 introduces substantial accuracy degradation and remains challenging; 2) PTQ effectiveness under MXFP depends strongly on format compatibility, with some algorithmic paradigms being consistently more effective than others; 3) PTQ performance exhibits highly consistent trends across model families and modalities, in particular, quantization sensitivity is dominated by the language model rather than the vision encoder in multimodal LLMs; 4) The scaling factor of quantization is a critical error source in MXFP4, and a simple pre-scale optimization strategy can significantly mitigate its impact. Together, these results provide practical guidance on adapting existing PTQ methods to MXFP quantization.