# SlidesGen-Bench: Evaluating Slides Generation via Computational and Quantitative Metrics

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.09487 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.09487/

## Key facts

- Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 14 of its 38 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Jan 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.17926/) (2023)
- [NIMA: Neural Image Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.05424/) (2017)
- [Judging the Judges: Evaluating Alignment and Vulnerabilities in LLMs-as-Judges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12624/) (2024)
- [PaddleOCR 3.0 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.05595/) (2025)
- [PPTAgent: Generating and Evaluating Presentations Beyond Text-to-Slides](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.03936/) (2025)
- [AutoPresent: Designing Structured Visuals from Scratch](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.00912/) (2025)
- [No Free Labels: Limitations of LLM-as-a-Judge Without Human Grounding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.05061/) (2025)
- [SlideCoder: Layout-aware RAG-enhanced Hierarchical Slide Generation from Design](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.07964/) (2025)
- [Auto-Slides: An Interactive Multi-Agent System for Creating and Customizing Research Presentations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.11062/) (2025)
- [Enhancing Presentation Slide Generation by LLMs with a Multi-Staged End-to-End Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.06556/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [PresentBench: A Fine-Grained Rubric-Based Benchmark for Slide Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.07244/) (2026)
- [BizGenEval: A Systematic Benchmark for Commercial Visual Content Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.25732/) (2026)
- [PPTBench: Can Coding Agents Reconstruct the Visual World through Structured, Editable Slides](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.29718/) (2026)
- [DeepSlide: From Artifacts to Presentation Delivery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.15202/) (2026)
- [X+Slides: Benchmarking Audience-Conditioned Slide Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.19256/) (2026)
- [Animation2Code: Evaluating Temporal Visual Reasoning in Video-to-Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.28593/) (2026)
- [ReDeck: Step-Level Render-Grounded Refinement for Document-to-Slide Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.00194/) (2026)
- [SLATE: Are AI-Generated Slides Educationally Effective? A Benchmark for Language Teaching Quality and Learner Knowledge Acquisition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.06212/) (2026)
- [SlideLab: Audience-Centered Scientific Slide Generation and Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.30294/) (2026)
- [InfoVis: Unified Slide Image Generation and Editing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.16784/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid evolution of Large Language Models (LLMs) has fostered diverse paradigms for automated slide generation, ranging from code-driven layouts to image-centric synthesis. However, evaluating these heterogeneous systems remains challenging, as existing protocols often struggle to provide comparable scores across architectures or rely on uncalibrated judgments. In this paper, we introduce SlidesGen-Bench, a benchmark designed to evaluate slide generation through a lens of three core principles: universality, quantification, and reliability. First, to establish a unified evaluation framework, we ground our analysis in the visual domain, treating terminal outputs as renderings to remain agnostic to the underlying generation method. Second, we propose a computational approach that quantitatively assesses slides across three distinct dimensions - Content, Aesthetics, and Editability - offering reproducible metrics where prior works relied on subjective or reference-dependent proxies. Finally, to ensure high correlation with human preference, we construct the Slides-Align1.5k dataset, a human preference aligned dataset covering slides from nine mainstream generation systems across seven scenarios. Our experiments demonstrate that SlidesGen-Bench achieves a higher degree of alignment with human judgment than existing evaluation pipelines. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/YunqiaoYang/SlidesGen-Bench.