# VeriTaS: The First Dynamic Benchmark for Multimodal Automated Fact-Checking

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.08611 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.08611/

## Key facts

- Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 35 of its 66 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 Jan 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 35)

- [FEVER: a large-scale dataset for Fact Extraction and VERification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.05355/) (2018)
- [Dynabench: Rethinking Benchmarking in NLP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.14337/) (2021)
- ["Liar, Liar Pants on Fire": A New Benchmark Dataset for Fake News Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.00648/) (2017)
- [AVeriTeC: A Dataset for Real-world Claim Verification with Evidence from the Web](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13117/) (2023)
- [NewsCLIPpings: Automatic Generation of Out-of-Context Multimodal Media](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.05893/) (2021)
- [End-to-End Multimodal Fact-Checking and Explanation Generation: A Challenging Dataset and Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.12487/) (2022)
- [Detecting and Grounding Multi-Modal Media Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.02556/) (2023)
- [MuMiN: A Large-Scale Multilingual Multimodal Fact-Checked Misinformation Social Network Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.11684/) (2022)
- [MMFakeBench: A Mixed-Source Multimodal Misinformation Detection Benchmark for LVLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.08772/) (2024)
- [Multimodal Automated Fact-Checking: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13507/) (2023)
- [Fact-Checking Meets Fauxtography: Verifying Claims About Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.11722/) (2019)
- [On the Origins of Memes by Means of Fringe Web Communities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.12512/) (2018)
- [Missing Counter-Evidence Renders NLP Fact-Checking Unrealistic for Misinformation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.13865/) (2022)
- [DEFAME: Dynamic Evidence-based FAct-checking with Multimodal Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.10510/) (2024)
- [VERITE: A Robust Benchmark for Multimodal Misinformation Detection Accounting for Unimodal Bias](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.14133/) (2023)
- [AmbiFC: Fact-Checking Ambiguous Claims with Evidence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.00640/) (2021)
- [The Automated Verification of Textual Claims (AVeriTeC) Shared Task](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.23850/) (2024)
- [AMMeBa: A Large-Scale Survey and Dataset of Media-Based Misinformation In-The-Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.11697/) (2024)
- [Fin-Fact: A Benchmark Dataset for Multimodal Financial Fact Checking and Explanation Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.08793/) (2023)
- [FactBench: A Dynamic Benchmark for In-the-Wild Language Model Factuality Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.22257/) (2024)
- [Claim Verification in the Age of Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.14317/) (2024)
- [AVerImaTeC: A Dataset for Automatic Verification of Image-Text Claims with Evidence from the Web](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.17978/) (2025)
- [From Chaos to Clarity: Claim Normalization to Empower Fact-Checking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.14338/) (2023)
- [FACTIFY3M: A Benchmark for Multimodal Fact Verification with Explainability through 5W Question-Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05523/) (2023)
- [Loki: An Open-Source Tool for Fact Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.01794/) (2024)
- [COVE: COntext and VEracity prediction for out-of-context images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.01194/) (2025)
- [Piecing It All Together: Verifying Multi-Hop Multimodal Claims](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.09547/) (2024)
- [Zero-shot and Few-shot Learning with Instruction-following LLMs for Claim Matching in Automated Fact-checking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.10860/) (2025)
- [Understanding the Use of Fauxtography on Social Media](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.11792/) (2020)
- [RealFactBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Real-World Fact-Checking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.12538/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Fact or Fake? Assessing the Role of Deepfake Detectors in Multimodal Misinformation Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.01854/) (2026)
- [Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words? Adaptive Multimodal Fact-Checking with Visual Evidence Necessity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.04692/) (2026)
- [ReMMD: Realistic Multilingual Multi-Image Agentic Verification for Multimodal Misinformation Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.24112/) (2026)
- [Evidence Triangulation for Multimodal Fact-Checking in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.31367/) (2026)
- [RCMN: Understanding Misleadingness in Influential Public Discourse](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.27358/) (2026)
- [EviScene: Beyond "Is It AI?" for Agentic Image Factuality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.14609/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The growing scale of online misinformation urgently demands Automated Fact-Checking (AFC). Existing benchmarks for evaluating AFC systems, however, are largely limited in terms of task scope, modalities, domain, language diversity, realism, or coverage of misinformation types. Critically, they are static, thus subject to data leakage as their claims enter the pretraining corpora of LLMs. As a result, benchmark performance no longer reliably reflects the actual ability to verify claims. We introduce Verified Theses and Statements (VeriTaS), the first dynamic benchmark for multimodal AFC, designed to remain robust under ongoing large-scale pretraining of foundation models. VeriTaS currently comprises 25,000 real-world claims from 104 professional fact-checking organizations across 54 languages, covering textual and audiovisual content. Claims are added quarterly via a fully automated seven-stage pipeline that normalizes claim formulation, retrieves original media, and maps heterogeneous expert verdicts to a novel, standardized, and disentangled scoring scheme with textual justifications. Through human evaluation, we demonstrate that the automated annotations closely match human judgments. We commit to updating VeriTaS in the future, establishing a leakage-resistant benchmark, supporting meaningful AFC evaluation in the era of rapidly evolving foundation models. The code and data are publicly available under https://veritas.mai.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de .
