# The Agent's First Day: Benchmarking Learning, Exploration, and Scheduling in the Workplace Scenarios

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.08173 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.08173/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 16 of its 37 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 Jan 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/agents/general-llm-agent-frameworks-and-benchmarks/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 16 of 16)

- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04761/) (2023)
- [Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.03442/) (2023)
- [SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06770/) (2023)
- [τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12045/) (2024)
- [Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15334/) (2023)
- [GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistants](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.12983/) (2023)
- [AppWorld: A Controllable World of Apps and People for Benchmarking Interactive Coding Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.18901/) (2024)
- [TheAgentCompany: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Consequential Real World Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.14161/) (2024)
- [The Tool Decathlon: Benchmarking Language Agents for Diverse, Realistic, and Long-Horizon Task Execution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.25726/) (2025)
- [MCPWorld: A Unified Benchmarking Testbed for API, GUI, and Hybrid Computer Use Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.07672/) (2025)
- [ARE: Scaling Up Agent Environments and Evaluations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.17158/) (2025)
- [Quantifying the Reasoning Abilities of LLMs on Real-world Clinical Cases](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.04691/) (2025)
- [Learning on the Job: An Experience-Driven Self-Evolving Agent for Long-Horizon Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.08002/) (2025)
- [TurtleBench: Evaluating Top Language Models via Real-World Yes/No Puzzles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.05262/) (2024)
- [KG-TRACES: Enhancing Large Language Models with Knowledge Graph-constrained Trajectory Reasoning and Attribution Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.00783/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [SentinelBench: A Benchmark for Long-Running Monitoring Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.05342/) (2026)
- [Do Self-Evolving Skills Generalize to Held-Out Tasks?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.39148/) (2026)
- [Deny Without Disabling: Authorization-Paired Evaluation and Control for Multi-Agent Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.00371/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid evolution of Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) has advanced workflow automation; however, existing research mainly targets performance upper bounds in static environments, overlooking robustness for stochastic real-world deployment. We identify three key challenges: dynamic task scheduling, active exploration under uncertainty, and continuous learning from experience. To bridge this gap, we introduce method, a dynamic evaluation environment that simulates a "trainee" agent continuously exploring a novel setting. Unlike traditional benchmarks, method evaluates agents along three dimensions: (1) context-aware scheduling for streaming tasks with varying priorities; (2) prudent information acquisition to reduce hallucination via active exploration; and (3) continuous evolution by distilling generalized strategies from rule-based, dynamically generated tasks. Experiments show that cutting-edge agents have significant deficiencies in dynamic environments, especially in active exploration and continual learning. Our work establishes a framework for assessing agent reliability, shifting evaluation from static tests to realistic, production-oriented scenarios. Our codes are available at https://github.com/KnowledgeXLab/EvoEnv