# When Abundance Conceals Weakness: Knowledge Conflict in Multilingual Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.07041 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.07041/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 16 of its 20 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Jan 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 16 of 16)

- [When Not to Trust Language Models: Investigating Effectiveness of Parametric and Non-Parametric Memories](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10511/) (2022)
- [The State and Fate of Linguistic Diversity and Inclusion in the NLP World](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.09095/) (2020)
- [Did Aristotle Use a Laptop? A Question Answering Benchmark with Implicit Reasoning Strategies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.02235/) (2021)
- [Entity-Based Knowledge Conflicts in Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.05052/) (2021)
- [Adaptive Chameleon or Stubborn Sloth: Revealing the Behavior of Large Language Models in Knowledge Conflicts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13300/) (2023)
- [Rich Knowledge Sources Bring Complex Knowledge Conflicts: Recalibrating Models to Reflect Conflicting Evidence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.13701/) (2022)
- [Multilingual LAMA: Investigating Knowledge in Multilingual Pretrained Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.00894/) (2021)
- [Tug-of-War Between Knowledge: Exploring and Resolving Knowledge Conflicts in Retrieval-Augmented Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14409/) (2024)
- [What Evidence Do Language Models Find Convincing?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.11782/) (2024)
- [Blinded by Generated Contexts: How Language Models Merge Generated and Retrieved Contexts When Knowledge Conflicts?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.11911/) (2024)
- [Parameters vs. Context: Fine-Grained Control of Knowledge Reliance in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.15888/) (2025)
- [AdaCAD: Adaptively Decoding to Balance Conflicts between Contextual and Parametric Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.07394/) (2024)
- [DRAGged into Conflicts: Detecting and Addressing Conflicting Sources in Search-Augmented LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.08500/) (2025)
- [Investigating Language Preference of Multilingual RAG Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.11175/) (2025)
- [Are Knowledge and Reference in Multilingual Language Models Cross-Lingually Consistent?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.12838/) (2025)
- [Are the LLMs Capable of Maintaining at Least the Language Genus?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.21561/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Where's Waldo? Query-language Preference under Cross-lingual Knowledge Disparities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.00606/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) encode vast world knowledge across multiple languages, yet their internal beliefs are often unevenly distributed across linguistic spaces. When external evidence contradicts these language-dependent memories, models encounter cross-lingual knowledge conflict, a phenomenon largely unexplored beyond English-centric settings. We introduce CLEAR, a Cross-Lingual knowlEdge conflict evAluation fRamework that systematically examines how multilingual LLMs reconcile conflicting internal beliefs and multilingual external evidence. CLEAR decomposes conflict resolution into four progressive scenarios, from multilingual parametric elicitation to competitive multi-source cross-lingual induction, and systematically evaluates model behavior across two complementary QA benchmarks with distinct task characteristics. We construct multilingual versions of ConflictQA and ConflictingQA covering 10 typologically diverse languages and evaluate six representative LLMs. Our experiments reveal a task-dependent decision dichotomy. In reasoning-intensive tasks, conflict resolution is dominated by language resource abundance, with high-resource languages exerting stronger persuasive power. In contrast, for entity-centric factual conflicts, linguistic affinity, not resource scale, becomes decisive, allowing low-resource but linguistically aligned languages to outperform distant high-resource ones.