# Tone Matters: The Impact of Linguistic Tone on Hallucination in VLMs

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.06460 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.06460/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Hallucination mitigation in LVLMs, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 32 of its 36 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Jan 2026.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [Hallucination mitigation in LVLMs](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/hallucination-mitigation-in-lvlms/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 32)

- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12191/) (2024)
- [Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.15043/) (2023)
- [Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.08073/) (2022)
- [Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.00837/) (2016)
- [Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10355/) (2023)
- [CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.06890/) (2016)
- [MiniCPM-V: A GPT-4V Level MLLM on Your Phone](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.01800/) (2024)
- [Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.13548/) (2023)
- [Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.04359/) (2021)
- [Object Hallucination in Image Captioning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.02156/) (2018)
- [Safe RLHF: Safe Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.12773/) (2023)
- [Winoground: Probing Vision and Language Models for Visio-Linguistic Compositionality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.03162/) (2022)
- [A Survey on Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.00253/) (2024)
- [Jailbreak in pieces: Compositional Adversarial Attacks on Multi-Modal Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.14539/) (2023)
- [Detecting and Preventing Hallucinations in Large Vision Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.06394/) (2023)
- [Reframing Instructional Prompts to GPTk's Language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.07830/) (2021)
- [Holistic Analysis of Hallucination in GPT-4V(ision): Bias and Interference Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.03287/) (2023)
- [Jailbreak Vision Language Models via Bi-Modal Adversarial Prompt](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.04031/) (2024)
- [VisIT-Bench: A Benchmark for Vision-Language Instruction Following Inspired by Real-World Use](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.06595/) (2023)
- [Evaluation and Analysis of Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.15126/) (2023)
- [Words or Vision: Do Vision-Language Models Have Blind Faith in Text?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.02199/) (2025)
- [VindLU: A Recipe for Effective Video-and-Language Pretraining](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.05051/) (2022)
- [Let there be a clock on the beach: Reducing Object Hallucination in Image Captioning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.01705/) (2021)
- [A Survey of Safety on Large Vision-Language Models: Attacks, Defenses and Evaluations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.14881/) (2025)
- [ImgTrojan: Jailbreaking Vision-Language Models with ONE Image](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.02910/) (2024)
- [Arondight: Red Teaming Large Vision Language Models with Auto-generated Multi-modal Jailbreak Prompts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.15050/) (2024)
- [Assessing and Learning Alignment of Unimodal Vision and Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.04616/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [LLM-as-Judge Framework for Evaluating Tone-Induced Hallucination in Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.18803/) (2026)
- [To Agree or To Be Right? The Grounding-Sycophancy Tradeoff in Medical Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.22623/) (2026)
- [Toward Accountable AI-Generated Content on Social Platforms: Steganographic Attribution and Multimodal Harm Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.10460/) (2026)
- [MOMAT: Mixture of Multiple Atlases for Low-Power Jailbreak Defense of Quantized LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.01058/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly used in safety-critical applications that require reliable visual grounding. However, these models often hallucinate details that are not present in the image to satisfy user prompts. While recent datasets and benchmarks have been introduced to evaluate systematic hallucinations in VLMs, many hallucination behaviors remain insufficiently characterized. In particular, prior work primarily focuses on object presence or absence, leaving it unclear how prompt phrasing and structural constraints can systematically induce hallucinations. In this paper, we investigate how different forms of prompt pressure influence hallucination behavior. We introduce Ghost-100, a procedurally generated dataset of synthetic scenes in which key visual details are deliberately removed, enabling controlled analysis of absence-based hallucinations. Using a structured 5-Level Prompt Intensity Framework, we vary prompts from neutral queries to toxic demands and rigid formatting constraints. We evaluate three representative open-weight VLMs: MiniCPM-V 2.6-8B, Qwen2-VL-7B, and Qwen3-VL-8B. Across all three models, hallucination rates do not increase monotonically with prompt intensity. All models exhibit reductions at higher intensity levels at different thresholds, though not all show sustained reduction under maximum coercion. These results suggest that current safety alignment is more effective at detecting semantic hostility than structural coercion, revealing model-specific limitations in handling compliance pressure. Our dataset is available at: https://github.com/bli1/tone-matters