# Ground What You See: Hallucination-Resistant MLLMs via Caption Feedback, Diversity-Aware Sampling, and Conflict Regularization

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.06224 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.06224/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Hallucination mitigation in LVLMs, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 29 of its 34 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Jan 2026.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [Hallucination mitigation in LVLMs](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/hallucination-mitigation-in-lvlms/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 29 of 29)

- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03741/) (2017)
- [Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.05530/) (2024)
- [LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.03326/) (2024)
- [Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.07572/) (2018)
- [MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.06281/) (2023)
- [MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual Contexts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.02255/) (2023)
- [Expanding Performance Boundaries of Open-Source Multimodal Models with Model, Data, and Test-Time Scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.05271/) (2024)
- [ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.10244/) (2022)
- [MiniCPM-V: A GPT-4V Level MLLM on Your Phone](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.01800/) (2024)
- [Mitigating Object Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models through Visual Contrastive Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.16922/) (2023)
- [Video-R1: Reinforcing Video Reasoning in MLLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.21776/) (2025)
- [R1-Onevision: Advancing Generalized Multimodal Reasoning through Cross-Modal Formalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.10615/) (2025)
- [R1-VL: Learning to Reason with Multimodal Large Language Models via Step-wise Group Relative Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.12937/) (2025)
- [LMM-R1: Empowering 3B LMMs with Strong Reasoning Abilities Through Two-Stage Rule-Based RL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.07536/) (2025)
- [Seg-Zero: Reasoning-Chain Guided Segmentation via Cognitive Reinforcement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.06520/) (2025)
- [Video-MMMU: Evaluating Knowledge Acquisition from Multi-Discipline Professional Videos](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.13826/) (2025)
- [R1-Zero's "Aha Moment" in Visual Reasoning on a 2B Non-SFT Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.05132/) (2025)
- [The Surprising Effectiveness of Negative Reinforcement in LLM Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.01347/) (2025)
- [MMVU: Measuring Expert-Level Multi-Discipline Video Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12380/) (2025)
- [Q-Insight: Understanding Image Quality via Visual Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.22679/) (2025)
- [VideoHallucer: Evaluating Intrinsic and Extrinsic Hallucinations in Large Video-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.16338/) (2024)
- [More Thinking, Less Seeing? Assessing Amplified Hallucination in Multimodal Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.21523/) (2025)
- [Boosting the Generalization and Reasoning of Vision Language Models with Curriculum Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.07065/) (2025)
- [Are Reasoning Models More Prone to Hallucination?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.23646/) (2025)
- [MetaSpatial: Reinforcing 3D Spatial Reasoning in VLMs for the Metaverse](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.18470/) (2025)
- [Visual Description Grounding Reduces Hallucinations and Boosts Reasoning in LVLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.15683/) (2024)
- [OThink-MR1: Stimulating multimodal generalized reasoning capabilities via dynamic reinforcement learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.16081/) (2025)
- [GFlowVLM: Enhancing Multi-step Reasoning in Vision-Language Models with Generative Flow Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.06514/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [Decoding by Perturbation: Mitigating MLLM Hallucinations via Dynamic Textual Perturbation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.12424/) (2026)
- [Reflect-R1: Evidence-Driven Reflection for Self-Correction in Long Video Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.27922/) (2026)
- [Mitigating Cross-Modal Hallucinations by Correcting Modality Misrouting in Omnimodal LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.18141/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved remarkable success across diverse tasks, their practical deployment is severely hindered by hallucination issues, which become particularly acute during Reinforcement Learning (RL) optimization. This paper systematically analyzes the root causes of hallucinations in MLLMs under RL training, identifying three critical factors: (1) an over-reliance on chained visual reasoning, where inaccurate initial descriptions or redundant information anchor subsequent inferences to incorrect premises; (2) insufficient exploration diversity during policy optimization, leading the model to generate overly confident but erroneous outputs; and (3) destructive conflicts between training samples, where Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) similarity causes false associations and unstable parameter updates. To address these challenges, we propose a comprehensive framework comprising three core modules. First, we enhance visual localization by introducing dedicated planning and captioning stages before the reasoning phase, employing a quality-based caption reward to ensure accurate initial anchoring. Second, to improve exploration, we categorize samples based on the mean and variance of their reward distributions, prioritizing samples with high variance to focus the model on diverse and informative data. Finally, to mitigate sample interference, we regulate NTK similarity by grouping sample pairs and applying an InfoNCE loss to push overly similar pairs apart and pull dissimilar ones closer, thereby guiding gradient interactions toward a balanced range. Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed method significantly reduces hallucination rates and effectively enhances the inference accuracy of MLLMs.