# An evaluation of LLMs for political bias in Western media: Israel-Hamas and Ukraine-Russia wars

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.06132 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.06132/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 15 of its 66 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 Jan 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 15 of 15)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.02531/) (2015)
- [DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.01108/) (2019)
- [Video-MME: The First-Ever Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark of Multi-modal LLMs in Video Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.21075/) (2024)
- [DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.04434/) (2024)
- [Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.07187/) (2016)
- [A Comprehensive Overview of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.06435/) (2023)
- [A Survey on Large Language Model (LLM) Security and Privacy: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.02003/) (2023)
- [Political-LLM: Large Language Models in Political Science](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.06864/) (2024)
- [Investigating Implicit Bias in Large Language Models: A Large-Scale Study of Over 50 LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.12864/) (2024)
- [COVID-19 sentiment analysis via deep learning during the rise of novel cases](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.10662/) (2021)
- [Propaganda and Misinformation on Facebook and Twitter during the Russian Invasion of Ukraine](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.00419/) (2022)
- [Deep learning for COVID-19 topic modelling via Twitter: Alpha, Delta and Omicron](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.00135/) (2023)
- [Quantifying Political Bias in News Articles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03404/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Belief Propagation in LLM World Models: Measuring Strategic Information Bias with Prediction Markets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.20441/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Political bias in media plays a critical role in shaping public opinion, voter behaviour, and broader democratic discourse. Subjective opinions and political bias can be found in media sources, such as newspapers, depending on their funding mechanisms and alliances with political parties. Automating the detection of political biases in media content can limit biases in elections. The impact of large language models (LLMs) in politics and media studies is becoming prominent. In this study, we utilise LLMs to compare the left-wing, right-wing, and neutral political opinions expressed in the Guardian and BBC. We review newspaper reporting that includes significant events such as the Russia-Ukraine war and the Hamas-Israel conflict. We analyse the proportion for each opinion to find the bias under different LLMs, including BERT, Gemini, and DeepSeek. Our results show that after the outbreak of the wars, the political bias of Western media shifts towards the left-wing and each LLM gives a different result. DeepSeek consistently showed a stable Left-leaning tendency, while BERT and Gemini remained closer to the Centre. The BBC and The Guardian showed distinct reporting behaviours across the two conflicts. In the Russia-Ukraine war, both outlets maintained relatively stable positions; however, in the Israel-Hamas conflict, we identified larger political bias shifts, particularly in Guardian coverage, suggesting a more event-driven pattern of reporting bias. These variations suggest that LLMs are shaped not only by their training data and architecture, but also by underlying worldviews with associated political biases.
