# Leveraging Foundation Models for Calibration-Free c-VEP BCIs

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.06028 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.06028/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 6 of its 30 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 4 Nov 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Large Brain Model for Learning Generic Representations with Tremendous EEG Data in BCI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.18765/) (2024)
- [BENDR: using transformers and a contrastive self-supervised learning task to learn from massive amounts of EEG data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.12037/) (2021)
- [Neuro-GPT: Towards A Foundation Model for EEG](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.03764/) (2023)
- [EEG-GPT: Exploring Capabilities of Large Language Models for EEG Classification and Interpretation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.18006/) (2024)
- [Review of Deep Representation Learning Techniques for Brain-Computer Interfaces and Recommendations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.19345/) (2024)
- [Exploring new territory: Calibration-free decoding for c-VEP BCI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.15521/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Foundation Models (FMs) have surged in popularity over the past five years, with applications spanning fields from computer vision to natural language processing. Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) have also gained momentum due to their potential to support individuals with complex disabilities. Among BCI paradigms, code-modulated Visual Evoked Potentials (c-VEPs) remain relatively understudied, despite offering high information transfer rates and large selection target capacities. However, c-VEP systems require lengthy calibration sessions, limiting their practicality outside of laboratory settings. In this study, we use a FM for the first time to eliminate the need for lengthy calibration in c-VEP BCI systems. We evaluated two approaches: (1) a truly calibration-free approach requiring no subject-specific data, and (2) a limited calibration approach, where we assessed the benefit of incorporating incremental amounts of calibration data. In both cases, a classification head is trained on data from other subjects. For a new subject, no calibration data is required in the calibration-free setup, making the c-VEP system effectively plug-and-play. The proposed method was tested on two c-VEP datasets. For the calibration-free approach, the average accuracy on the first dataset (n = 17) was 68.8% +/- 17.6%, comparable to the full-calibration performance reported in the original study (66.2% +/- 13.8%), which required approximately 11 minutes of calibration. On the second dataset (n = 12), the calibration-free accuracy was 71.8% +/- 20.2%, versus 93.7% +/- 5.5% from the original study, which required around 3.5 minutes. A limited-calibration approach using only 20% of the subject's data (approximately 43 seconds) yielded 92% +/- 5.2% accuracy. These results indicate that our FM-based approach can effectively eliminate or significantly reduce the need for lengthy calibration in c-VEP BCIs.