# Simplify-This: A Comparative Analysis of Prompt-Based and Fine-Tuned LLMs

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.05794 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.05794/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 25 of its 42 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Jan 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 25 of 25)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10683/) (2019)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehension](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.13461/) (2019)
- [BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09675/) (2019)
- [Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.0473/) (2014)
- [HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.03771/) (2019)
- [Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.08745/) (2018)
- [Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.04368/) (2017)
- [PEGASUS: Pre-training with Extracted Gap-sentences for Abstractive Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.08777/) (2019)
- [Teaching Machines to Read and Comprehend](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.03340/) (2015)
- [ProphetNet: Predicting Future N-gram for Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.04063/) (2020)
- [A Neural Conversational Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.05869/) (2015)
- [Reformulating Unsupervised Style Transfer as Paraphrase Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.05700/) (2020)
- [Sentence Simplification with Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.10931/) (2017)
- [ASSET: A Dataset for Tuning and Evaluation of Sentence Simplification Models with Multiple Rewriting Transformations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.00481/) (2020)
- [LENS: A Learnable Evaluation Metric for Text Simplification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.09739/) (2022)
- [EASSE: Easier Automatic Sentence Simplification Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.04567/) (2019)
- [BLESS: Benchmarking Large Language Models on Sentence Simplification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.15773/) (2023)
- [Evaluate & Evaluation on the Hub: Better Best Practices for Data and Model Measurements](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.01970/) (2022)
- [Med-EASi: Finely Annotated Dataset and Models for Controllable Simplification of Medical Texts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.09155/) (2023)
- [Dancing Between Success and Failure: Edit-level Simplification Evaluation using SALSA](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14458/) (2023)
- [Progressive Document-level Text Simplification via Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.03857/) (2025)
- [An In-depth Evaluation of Large Language Models in Sentence Simplification with Error-based Human Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.04963/) (2024)
- [Is it Possible to Modify Text to a Target Readability Level? An Initial Investigation Using Zero-Shot Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.12551/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Example-Guided Prompting for Document-Level Text Simplification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.05447/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) enable strong text generation, and in general there is a practical tradeoff between fine-tuning and prompt engineering. We introduce Simplify-This, a comparative study evaluating both paradigms for text simplification with encoder-decoder LLMs across multiple benchmarks, using a range of evaluation metrics. Fine-tuned models consistently deliver stronger structural simplification, whereas prompting often attains higher semantic similarity scores yet tends to copy inputs. A human evaluation favors fine-tuned outputs overall. We release code, a cleaned derivative dataset used in our study, checkpoints of fine-tuned models, and prompt templates to facilitate reproducibility and future work.
