# On the Limitations of Rank-One Model Editing in Answering Multi-hop Questions

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.04600 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.04600/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 10 of its 14 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 Jan 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.05262/) (2022)
- [MQuAKE: Assessing Knowledge Editing in Language Models via Multi-Hop Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14795/) (2023)
- [Does Localization Inform Editing? Surprising Differences in Causality-Based Localization vs. Knowledge Editing in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.04213/) (2023)
- [Towards Continual Knowledge Learning of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.03215/) (2021)
- [Inspecting and Editing Knowledge Representations in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.00740/) (2023)
- [Hopping Too Late: Exploring the Limitations of Large Language Models on Multi-Hop Queries](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12775/) (2024)
- [Rebuilding ROME : Resolving Model Collapse during Sequential Model Editing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.07175/) (2024)
- [Locate-then-edit for Multi-hop Factual Recall under Knowledge Editing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.06331/) (2024)
- [Unlocking Efficient, Scalable, and Continual Knowledge Editing with Basis-Level Representation Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.00306/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in Knowledge Editing (KE), particularly Rank-One Model Editing (ROME), show superior efficiency over fine-tuning and in-context learning for updating single-hop facts in transformers. However, these methods face significant challenges when applied to multi-hop reasoning tasks requiring knowledge chaining. In this work, we study the effect of editing knowledge with ROME on different layer depths and identify three key failure modes. First, the "hopping-too-late" problem occurs as later layers lack access to necessary intermediate representations. Second, generalization ability deteriorates sharply when editing later layers. Third, the model overfits to edited knowledge, incorrectly prioritizing edited-hop answers regardless of context. To mitigate the issues of "hopping-too-late" and generalisation decay, we propose Redundant Editing, a simple yet effective strategy that enhances multi-hop reasoning. Our experiments demonstrate that this approach can improve accuracy on 2-hop questions by at least 15.5 percentage points, representing a 96% increase over the previous single-edit strategy, while trading off some specificity and language naturalness.