# P-Check: Advancing Personalized Reward Model via Learning to Generate Dynamic Checklist

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.02986 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.02986/

## Key facts

- Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Human values and AI feedback alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation.
- Builds on 15 of its 52 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 6 Jan 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation / [Human values and AI feedback alignment](https://mlsanity.com/alignment/human-values-and-ai-feedback-alignment/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 15 of 15)

- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.06180/) (2023)
- [Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.08593/) (2019)
- [Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.04132/) (2024)
- [Scaling Relationship on Learning Mathematical Reasoning with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.01825/) (2023)
- [Rubrics as Rewards: Reinforcement Learning Beyond Verifiable Domains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.17746/) (2025)
- [Personalized Soups: Personalized Large Language Model Alignment via Post-hoc Parameter Merging](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.11564/) (2023)
- [Inference-Time Scaling for Generalist Reward Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.02495/) (2025)
- [OpenRubrics: Towards Scalable Synthetic Rubric Generation for Reward Modeling and LLM Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.07743/) (2025)
- [GenPRM: Scaling Test-Time Compute of Process Reward Models via Generative Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.00891/) (2025)
- [NextQuill: Causal Preference Modeling for Enhancing LLM Personalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.02368/) (2025)
- [StepWiser: Stepwise Generative Judges for Wiser Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.19229/) (2025)
- [Bradley-Terry and Multi-Objective Reward Modeling Are Complementary](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.07375/) (2025)
- [BESPOKE: Benchmark for Search-Augmented Large Language Model Personalization via Diagnostic Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.21106/) (2025)
- [Stop Playing the Guessing Game! Target-free User Simulation for Evaluating Conversational Recommender Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.16160/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [Reward Hacking in the Era of Large Models: Mechanisms, Emergent Misalignment, Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.13602/) (2026)
- [Learning Query-Specific Rubrics from Human Preferences for DeepResearch Report Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.03619/) (2026)
- [Beyond Borrowed Histories: Person-Aligned User Simulation for Interactive Role-Playing Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.27816/) (2026)
- [ExpVoyager: Direct Experience Navigation for Dynamic Agent Skill Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.32630/) (2026)
- [Gradient-Aligned Pair Selection for Personalized Preference Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.00061/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Recent approaches in personalized reward modeling have primarily focused on leveraging user interaction history to align model judgments with individual preferences. However, existing approaches largely treat user context as a static or implicit conditioning signal, failing to capture the dynamic and multi-faceted nature of human judgment. In this paper, we propose P-Check, a novel personalized reward modeling framework, designed to train a plug-and-play checklist generator that synthesizes dynamic evaluation criteria for guiding the reward prediction. To better align these checklists with personalized nuances, we introduce Preference-Contrastive Criterion Weighting, a training strategy that assigns saliency scores to criteria based on their discriminative power for personalized judgment. We conduct extensive experiments and demonstrate that P-Check not only improves reward accuracy but also enhances downstream personalized generation, and remains robust in OOD scenarios.