# SimRPD: Optimizing Recruitment Proactive Dialogue Agents through Simulator-Based Data Evaluation and Selection

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.02871 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.02871/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 26 of its 61 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 6 Jan 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 26 of 26)

- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.03442/) (2023)
- [Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10560/) (2022)
- [G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.16634/) (2023)
- [SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08821/) (2021)
- [CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model Society](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17760/) (2023)
- [LIMA: Less Is More for Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.11206/) (2023)
- [Discovering Language Model Behaviors with Model-Written Evaluations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.09251/) (2022)
- [What Makes Good Data for Alignment? A Comprehensive Study of Automatic Data Selection in Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.15685/) (2023)
- [The Curse of Recursion: Training on Generated Data Makes Models Forget](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.17493/) (2023)
- [From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.12032/) (2023)
- [The False Promise of Imitating Proprietary LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15717/) (2023)
- [Deal or No Deal? End-to-End Learning for Negotiation Dialogues](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.05125/) (2017)
- [Proactive Human-Machine Conversation with Explicit Conversation Goals](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.05572/) (2019)
- [On the Planning Abilities of Large Language Models (A Critical Investigation with a Proposed Benchmark)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.06706/) (2023)
- [Know You First and Be You Better: Modeling Human-Like User Simulators via Implicit Profiles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.18968/) (2025)
- [A Sequence-to-Sequence Model for User Simulation in Spoken Dialogue Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.00070/) (2016)
- [A Survey on Recent Advances and Challenges in Reinforcement Learning Methods for Task-Oriented Dialogue Policy Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.13675/) (2022)
- [Target-oriented Proactive Dialogue Systems with Personalization: Problem Formulation and Dataset Curation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.07397/) (2023)
- [Follow Me: Conversation Planning for Target-driven Recommendation Dialogue Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.03516/) (2022)
- [Target-constrained Bidirectional Planning for Generation of Target-oriented Proactive Dialogue](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.06063/) (2024)
- [Enhancing Goal-oriented Proactive Dialogue Systems via Consistency Reflection and Correction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.13366/) (2025)
- [MADS: Multi-Agent Dialogue Simulation for Diverse Persuasion Data Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.05124/) (2025)
- [From Answers to Guidance: A Proactive Dialogue System for Legal Documents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.19723/) (2025)
- [Agentic Persona Control and Task State Tracking for Realistic User Simulation in Interactive Scenarios](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.15290/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Task-oriented proactive dialogue agents play a pivotal role in recruitment, particularly for steering conversations towards specific business outcomes, such as acquiring social-media contacts for private-channel conversion. Although supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning have proven effective for training such agents, their performance is heavily constrained by the scarcity of high-quality, goal-oriented domain-specific training data. To address this challenge, we propose SimRPD, a three-stage framework for training recruitment proactive dialogue agents. First, we develop a high-fidelity user simulator to synthesize large-scale conversational data through multi-turn online dialogue. Then we introduce a multi-dimensional evaluation framework based on Chain-of-Intention (CoI) to comprehensively assess the simulator and effectively select high-quality data, incorporating both global-level and instance-level metrics. Finally, we train the recruitment proactive dialogue agent on the selected dataset. Experiments in a real-world recruitment scenario demonstrate that SimRPD outperforms existing simulator-based data selection strategies, highlighting its practical value for industrial deployment and its potential applicability to other business-oriented dialogue scenarios.