# Causal Emotion Recognition in Conversation: Context Saturation and Discourse-Marker Evidence

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.00181 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.00181/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 14 of its 31 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 Jan 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.10084/) (2019)
- [MELD: A Multimodal Multi-Party Dataset for Emotion Recognition in Conversations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.02508/) (2018)
- [DialogueRNN: An Attentive RNN for Emotion Detection in Conversations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.00405/) (2018)
- [DialogueGCN: A Graph Convolutional Neural Network for Emotion Recognition in Conversation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.11540/) (2019)
- [COSMIC: COmmonSense knowledge for eMotion Identification in Conversations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.02795/) (2020)
- [Directed Acyclic Graph Network for Conversational Emotion Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.12907/) (2021)
- [DialogueCRN: Contextual Reasoning Networks for Emotion Recognition in Conversations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.01978/) (2021)
- [UniMSE: Towards Unified Multimodal Sentiment Analysis and Emotion Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.11256/) (2022)
- [EmoCaps: Emotion Capsule based Model for Conversational Emotion Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.13504/) (2022)
- [Multimodal Sentiment Analysis using Hierarchical Fusion with Context Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.06228/) (2018)
- [Contrast and Generation Make BART a Good Dialogue Emotion Recognizer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.11202/) (2021)
- [BiERU: Bidirectional Emotional Recurrent Unit for Conversational Sentiment Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.00492/) (2020)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We address two persistent gaps in Emotion Recognition in Conversation: which modeling choices materially affect performance, and how recognition findings connect to interpretable discourse-level patterns. We study both through a systematic investigation on IEMOCAP with cross-dataset validation on MELD. For recognition, we run controlled ablations with 10 random seeds and paired significance tests with multiple-comparisons correction, yielding three findings. First, conversational context is the dominant factor, but performance saturates quickly: roughly 90% of the gain is captured within the most recent 10-30 preceding turns, depending on the label set. Second, hierarchical sentence representations help most in utterance-only settings and show a clear advantage on MELD, but their benefit disappears once turn-level context is available, suggesting that conversational history subsumes much of the intra-utterance structure. Third, integrating an external affective lexicon does not improve results, consistent with pretrained encoders already capturing most of the affective signal needed for ERC. Under a strictly causal setting, our simple models achieve strong performance (82.69% 4-way; 67.07% 6-way weighted F1), showing that competitive accuracy is achievable without future turns. For linguistic analysis, we examine 5,286 discourse-marker occurrences and find a reliable association between emotion and marker position (p < .0001). Sad utterances show reduced left-periphery marker usage (21.9%) relative to other emotions (28-32%), consistent with accounts linking left-periphery markers to active discourse management. This aligns with our recognition results, where Sad benefits most from conversational context (+22 percentage points), suggesting sadness may be more context-dependent than emotions with stronger local pragmatic cues.