# HOLOGRAPH: Active Causal Discovery via Sheaf-Theoretic Alignment of Large Language Model Priors

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.24478 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.24478/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Process reward models for reasoning, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation.
- Builds on 9 of its 27 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 30 Dec 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation / [Process reward models for reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/alignment/process-reward-models-for-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [DAGs with NO TEARS: Continuous Optimization for Structure Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.01422/) (2018)
- [Causal Reasoning and Large Language Models: Opening a New Frontier for Causality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.00050/) (2023)
- [Neural Sheaf Diffusion: A Topological Perspective on Heterophily and Oversmoothing in GNNs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.04579/) (2022)
- [On the Role of Sparsity and DAG Constraints for Learning Linear DAGs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.10201/) (2020)
- [DAGMA: Learning DAGs via M-matrices and a Log-Determinant Acyclicity Characterization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.08037/) (2022)
- [Sheaf Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.06333/) (2020)
- [Learning Causal Graphs with Small Interventions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.00041/) (2015)
- [Causality for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.15319/) (2024)
- [Large Causal Models from Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.07796/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Causal discovery from observational data remains fundamentally limited by identifiability constraints. Recent work has explored leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) as sources of prior causal knowledge, but existing approaches rely on heuristic integration that lacks theoretical grounding. We introduce HOLOGRAPH, a framework that formalizes LLM-guided causal discovery through sheaf theory--representing local causal beliefs as sections of a presheaf over variable subsets. Our key insight is that coherent global causal structure corresponds to the existence of a global section, while topological obstructions manifest as non-vanishing sheaf cohomology. We propose the Algebraic Latent Projection to handle hidden confounders and Natural Gradient Descent on the belief manifold for principled optimization. Experiments on synthetic and real-world benchmarks demonstrate that HOLOGRAPH provides rigorous mathematical foundations while achieving competitive performance on causal discovery tasks with 50-100 variables. Our sheaf-theoretic analysis reveals that while Identity, Transitivity, and Gluing axioms are satisfied to numerical precision (<10^{-6}), the Locality axiom fails for larger graphs, suggesting fundamental non-local coupling in latent variable projections. Code is available at [https://github.com/hyunjun1121/holograph](https://github.com/hyunjun1121/holograph).