# On the Existence and Behavior of Secondary Attention Sinks

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.22213 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.22213/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 18 of its 21 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 22 Dec 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03874/) (2021)
- [RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embedding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.09864/) (2021)
- [Efficient Streaming Language Models with Attention Sinks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.17453/) (2023)
- [Code Llama: Open Foundation Models for Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.12950/) (2023)
- [The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.03658/) (2023)
- [YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.00071/) (2023)
- [PyramidKV: Dynamic KV Cache Compression based on Pyramidal Information Funneling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.02069/) (2024)
- [Effective Long-Context Scaling of Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.16039/) (2023)
- [Massive Activations in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.17762/) (2024)
- [When Attention Sink Emerges in Language Models: An Empirical View](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.10781/) (2024)
- [Unveiling and Harnessing Hidden Attention Sinks: Enhancing Large Language Models without Training through Attention Calibration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.15765/) (2024)
- [Spectral Filters, Dark Signals, and Attention Sinks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.09221/) (2024)
- [IntactKV: Improving Large Language Model Quantization by Keeping Pivot Tokens Intact](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.01241/) (2024)
- [Attention Sinks and Compression Valleys in LLMs are Two Sides of the Same Coin](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.06477/) (2025)
- [Prefixing Attention Sinks can Mitigate Activation Outliers for Large Language Model Quantization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12016/) (2024)
- [What are you sinking? A geometric approach on attention sink](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.02546/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Attention Sinks Are Provably Necessary in Softmax Transformers: Evidence from Trigger-Conditional Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.11487/) (2026)
- [Attention Sink in Transformers: A Survey on Utilization, Interpretation, and Mitigation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.10098/) (2026)
- [Surgery: Mitigating Harmful Fine-Tuning for Large Language Models via Attention Sink](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.05228/) (2026)
- [Attention Sinks and Outliers in Attention Residuals](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.17887/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Attention sinks are tokens, often the beginning-of-sequence (BOS) token, that receive disproportionately high attention despite limited semantic relevance. In this work, we identify a class of attention sinks, which we term secondary sinks, that differ fundamentally from the sinks studied in prior works, which we term primary sinks. While prior works have identified that tokens other than BOS can sometimes become sinks, they were found to exhibit properties analogous to the BOS token. Specifically, they emerge at the same layer, persist throughout the network and draw a large amount of attention mass. Whereas, we find the existence of secondary sinks that arise primarily in middle layers and can persist for a variable number of layers, and draw a smaller, but still significant, amount of attention mass. Through extensive experiments across 11 model families, we analyze where these secondary sinks appear, their properties, how they are formed, and their impact on the attention mechanism. Specifically, we show that: (1) these sinks are formed by specific middle-layer MLP modules; these MLPs map token representations to vectors that align with the direction of the primary sink of that layer. (2) The ℓ2-norm of these vectors determines the sink score of the secondary sink, and also the number of layers it lasts for, thereby leading to different impacts on the attention mechanisms accordingly. (3) The primary sink weakens in middle layers, coinciding with the emergence of secondary sinks. We observe that in larger-scale models, the location and lifetime of the sinks, together referred to as sink levels, appear in a more deterministic and frequent manner. Specifically, we identify three sink levels in QwQ-32B and six levels in Qwen3-14B. We open-sourced our findings at github.com/JeffreyWong20/Secondary-Attention-Sinks.