# Explainable Statute Prediction via Attention-based Model and LLM Prompting

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.21902 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.21902/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 16 of its 25 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 26 Dec 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 16 of 16)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.10084/) (2019)
- [BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09675/) (2019)
- [Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.11916/) (2022)
- [Longformer: The Long-Document Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.05150/) (2020)
- [Attention is not Explanation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.10186/) (2019)
- [Attention is not not Explanation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.04626/) (2019)
- [LexGLUE: A Benchmark Dataset for Legal Language Understanding in English](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.00976/) (2021)
- [Neural Legal Judgment Prediction in English](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.02059/) (2019)
- [Leveraging BERT for Extractive Text Summarization on Lectures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.04165/) (2019)
- [Distinguish Confusing Law Articles for Legal Judgment Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.02557/) (2020)
- [Counterfactual Explainable Recommendation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.10539/) (2021)
- [Pre-trained Language Models for the Legal Domain: A Case Study on Indian Law](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.06049/) (2022)
- [ChatGPT may Pass the Bar Exam soon, but has a Long Way to Go for the LexGLUE benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.12202/) (2023)
- [LeSICiN: A Heterogeneous Graph-based Approach for Automatic Legal Statute Identification from Indian Legal Documents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.14731/) (2021)
- [Measuring Information in Text Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.04557/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we explore the problem of automatic statute prediction where for a given case description, a subset of relevant statutes are to be predicted. Here, the term "statute" refers to a section, a sub-section, or an article of any specific Act. Addressing this problem would be useful in several applications such as AI-assistant for lawyers and legal question answering system. For better user acceptance of such Legal AI systems, we believe the predictions should also be accompanied by human understandable explanations. We propose two techniques for addressing this problem of statute prediction with explanations -- (i) AoS (Attention-over-Sentences) which uses attention over sentences in a case description to predict statutes relevant for it and (ii) LLMPrompt which prompts an LLM to predict as well as explain relevance of a certain statute. AoS uses smaller language models, specifically sentence transformers and is trained in a supervised manner whereas LLMPrompt uses larger language models in a zero-shot manner and explores both standard as well as Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting techniques. Both these models produce explanations for their predictions in human understandable forms. We compare statute prediction performance of both the proposed techniques with each other as well as with a set of competent baselines, across two popular datasets. Also, we evaluate the quality of the generated explanations through an automated counter-factual manner as well as through human evaluation.