# Bridging the Copyright Gap: Do Large Vision-Language Models Recognize and Respect Copyrighted Content?

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.21871 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.21871/

## Key facts

- Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 9 of its 22 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 26 Dec 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Multimodal reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/multimodal-reasoning/)
- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/mllm-jailbreaks-and-adversarial-robustness/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09675/) (2019)
- [Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.03744/) (2023)
- [Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.06674/) (2023)
- [ChatGLM: A Family of Large Language Models from GLM-130B to GLM-4 All Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12793/) (2024)
- [VisRAG: Vision-based Retrieval-augmented Generation on Multi-modality Documents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.10594/) (2024)
- [MMICL: Empowering Vision-language Model with Multi-Modal In-Context Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.07915/) (2023)
- [Speak, Memory: An Archaeology of Books Known to ChatGPT/GPT-4](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.00118/) (2023)
- [SHIELD: Evaluation and Defense Strategies for Copyright Compliance in LLM Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12975/) (2024)
- [Do LLMs Know to Respect Copyright Notice?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.01136/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [ACIArena: Toward Unified Evaluation for Agent Cascading Injection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.07775/) (2026)
- [TSEmbed: Unlocking Task Scaling in Universal Multimodal Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.04772/) (2026)
- [Compiling Activation Steering into Weights via Null-Space Constraints for Stealthy Backdoors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.12359/) (2026)
- [Visual-Noise Guided In-Context Distillation for Multimodal Large Language Model Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.00105/) (2026)
- ["I See What You Did There": Can Large Vision-Language Models Understand Multimodal Puns?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.05930/) (2026)
- [Spotlight and Shadow: Attention-Guided Dual-Anchor Introspective Decoding for MLLM Hallucination Mitigation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.10071/) (2026)
- [DNF: Dual-Layer Nested Fingerprinting for Large Language Model Intellectual Property Protection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.08223/) (2026)
- [Demystifying the Optimal Fair Classifier in Multi-Class Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.00656/) (2026)
- [The Boy Who Cried Wolf: Adversarial Misclassification of Safe Inputs as Unsafe in Multimodal Guardrails](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.01373/) (2026)
- [CUSE: Fine-Grained Multimodal Unlearning with Counterfactual Guidance and On-Policy Self-Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.14763/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large vision-language models (LVLMs) have achieved remarkable advancements in multimodal reasoning tasks. However, their widespread accessibility raises critical concerns about potential copyright infringement. Will LVLMs accurately recognize and comply with copyright regulations when encountering copyrighted content (i.e., user input, retrieved documents) in the context? Failure to comply with copyright regulations may lead to serious legal and ethical consequences, particularly when LVLMs generate responses based on copyrighted materials (e.g., retrieved book experts, news reports). In this paper, we present a comprehensive evaluation of various LVLMs, examining how they handle copyrighted content -- such as book excerpts, news articles, music lyrics, and code documentation when they are presented as visual inputs. To systematically measure copyright compliance, we introduce a large-scale benchmark dataset comprising 50,000 multimodal query-content pairs designed to evaluate how effectively LVLMs handle queries that could lead to copyright infringement. Given that real-world copyrighted content may or may not include a copyright notice, the dataset includes query-content pairs in two distinct scenarios: with and without a copyright notice. For the former, we extensively cover four types of copyright notices to account for different cases. Our evaluation reveals that even state-of-the-art closed-source LVLMs exhibit significant deficiencies in recognizing and respecting the copyrighted content, even when presented with the copyright notice. To solve this limitation, we introduce a novel tool-augmented defense framework for copyright compliance, which reduces infringement risks in all scenarios. Our findings underscore the importance of developing copyright-aware LVLMs to ensure the responsible and lawful use of copyrighted content.