# Where Did This Sentence Come From? Tracing Provenance in LLM Reasoning Distillation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.20908 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.20908/

## Key facts

- Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 26 of its 40 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 Dec 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/prompting-and-chain-of-thought-reasoning/)
- Knowledge distillation / [Knowledge distillation for LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/distill/knowledge-distillation-for-llms/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 26 of 26)

- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.02531/) (2015)
- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12948/) (2025)
- [Qwen2.5 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.15115/) (2024)
- [gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.10925/) (2025)
- [OpenAI o1 System Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.16720/) (2024)
- [OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14008/) (2024)
- [Paying More Attention to Attention: Improving the Performance of Convolutional Neural Networks via Attention Transfer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.03928/) (2016)
- [LIMO: Less is More for Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.03387/) (2025)
- [Cognitive Behaviors that Enable Self-Improving Reasoners, or, Four Habits of Highly Effective STaRs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.01307/) (2025)
- [OpenThoughts: Data Recipes for Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.04178/) (2025)
- [Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning in Large Language Models with One Training Example](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.20571/) (2025)
- [DeepMath-103K: A Large-Scale, Challenging, Decontaminated, and Verifiable Mathematical Dataset for Advancing Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.11456/) (2025)
- [DistiLLM: Towards Streamlined Distillation for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03898/) (2024)
- [Back to Basics: Revisiting REINFORCE Style Optimization for Learning from Human Feedback in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14740/) (2024)
- [NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 2: An Accurate and Efficient Hybrid Mamba-Transformer Reasoning Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.14444/) (2025)
- [DistiLLM-2: A Contrastive Approach Boosts the Distillation of LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.07067/) (2025)
- [AceReason-Nemotron 1.1: Advancing Math and Code Reasoning through SFT and RL Synergy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.13284/) (2025)
- [SEAL: Steerable Reasoning Calibration of Large Language Models for Free](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.07986/) (2025)
- [The Best Instruction-Tuning Data are Those That Fit](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.04194/) (2025)
- [1.4 Million Open-Source Distilled Reasoning Dataset to Empower Large Language Model Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.19633/) (2025)
- [Evading Data Contamination Detection for Language Models is (too) Easy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.02823/) (2024)
- [ReasoningFlow: Semantic Structure of Complex Reasoning Traces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.02532/) (2025)
- [Efficient Reasoning Through Suppression of Self-Affirmation Reflections in Large Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.12353/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Distribution-Aligned Sequence Distillation for Superior Long-CoT Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.09088/) (2026)
- [Prefix Teach, Suffix Fade: Local Teachability Collapse in Strong-to-Weak On-Policy Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.13643/) (2026)
- [Backtracking When It Strays: Mitigating Dual Exposure Biases in LLM Reasoning Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.19433/) (2026)
- [Decomposing the Basic Abilities of Large Language Models: Mitigating Cross-Task Interference in Multi-Task Instruct-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.05676/) (2026)
- [Self-Distillation for Multi-Token Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.23911/) (2026)
- [Are Rationales Necessary and Sufficient? Tuning LLMs for Explainable Misinformation Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.19285/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Reasoning distillation has attracted increasing attention. It typically leverages a large teacher model to generate reasoning paths, which are then used to fine-tune a student model so that it mimics the teacher's behavior in training contexts. However, previous approaches have lacked a detailed analysis of the origins of the distilled model's capabilities. It remains unclear whether the student can maintain consistent behaviors with the teacher in novel test-time contexts, or whether it regresses to its original output patterns, raising concerns about the generalization of distillation models. To analyse this question, we introduce a cross-model Reasoning Distillation Provenance Tracing framework. For each action (e.g., a sentence) produced by the distilled model, we obtain the predictive probabilities assigned by the teacher, the original student, and the distilled model under the same context. By comparing these probabilities, we classify each action into different categories. By systematically disentangling the provenance of each action, we experimentally demonstrate that, in test-time contexts, the distilled model can indeed generate teacher-originated actions, which correlate with and plausibly explain observed performance on distilled model. Building on this analysis, we further propose a teacher-guided data selection method. Unlike prior approach that rely on heuristics, our method directly compares teacher-student divergences on the training data, providing a principled selection criterion. We validate the effectiveness of our approach across multiple representative teacher models and diverse student models. The results highlight the utility of our provenance-tracing framework and underscore its promise for reasoning distillation. We hope to share Reasoning Distillation Provenance Tracing and our insights into reasoning distillation with the community.