# FedDPC : Handling Data Heterogeneity and Partial Client Participation in Federated Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.20329 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.20329/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 28 of its 33 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 23 Dec 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 28 of 28)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.05629/) (2016)
- [Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.04977/) (2019)
- [Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.06127/) (2018)
- [Group Normalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.08494/) (2018)
- [On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.02189/) (2019)
- [Federated Learning with Non-IID Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.00582/) (2018)
- [Adaptive Federated Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.00295/) (2020)
- [Tackling the Objective Inconsistency Problem in Heterogeneous Federated Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.07481/) (2020)
- [Model-Contrastive Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.16257/) (2021)
- [Federated Learning Based on Dynamic Regularization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.04263/) (2021)
- [Towards Personalized Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00710/) (2021)
- [Bayesian Nonparametric Federated Learning of Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.12022/) (2019)
- [A Downsampled Variant of ImageNet as an Alternative to the CIFAR datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.08819/) (2017)
- [Orthogonal Gradient Descent for Continual Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.07104/) (2019)
- [Personalized Cross-Silo Federated Learning on Non-IID Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.03797/) (2020)
- [Communication-Efficient On-Device Machine Learning: Federated Distillation and Augmentation under Non-IID Private Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.11479/) (2018)
- [Achieving Linear Speedup with Partial Worker Participation in Non-IID Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.11203/) (2021)
- [FedDC: Federated Learning with Non-IID Data via Local Drift Decoupling and Correction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11751/) (2022)
- [Local Learning Matters: Rethinking Data Heterogeneity in Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.14213/) (2021)
- [FedCM: Federated Learning with Client-level Momentum](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.10874/) (2021)
- [Fast Federated Learning in the Presence of Arbitrary Device Unavailability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.04159/) (2021)
- [FedExP: Speeding Up Federated Averaging via Extrapolation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.09604/) (2023)
- [FedVARP: Tackling the Variance Due to Partial Client Participation in Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.14130/) (2022)
- [FedSpeed: Larger Local Interval, Less Communication Round, and Higher Generalization Accuracy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.10429/) (2023)
- [FedBR: Improving Federated Learning on Heterogeneous Data via Local Learning Bias Reduction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.13462/) (2022)
- [Implicit Gradient Alignment in Distributed and Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.13897/) (2021)
- [Anchor Sampling for Federated Learning with Partial Client Participation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.05891/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Data heterogeneity is a significant challenge in modern federated learning (FL) as it creates variance in local model updates, causing the aggregated global model to shift away from the true global optimum. Partial client participation in FL further exacerbates this issue by skewing the aggregation of local models towards the data distribution of participating clients. This creates additional variance in the global model updates, causing the global model to converge away from the optima of the global objective. These variances lead to instability in FL training, which degrades global model performance and slows down FL training. While existing literature primarily focuses on addressing data heterogeneity, the impact of partial client participation has received less attention. In this paper, we propose FedDPC, a novel FL method, designed to improve FL training and global model performance by mitigating both data heterogeneity and partial client participation. FedDPC addresses these issues by projecting each local update onto the previous global update, thereby controlling variance in both local and global updates. To further accelerate FL training, FedDPC employs adaptive scaling for each local update before aggregation. Extensive experiments on image classification tasks with multiple heterogeneously partitioned datasets validate the effectiveness of FedDPC. The results demonstrate that FedDPC outperforms state-of-the-art FL algorithms by achieving faster reduction in training loss and improved test accuracy across communication rounds.