# Attention Fusion for Bridge Deck Delamination Detection

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.20113 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.20113/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 7 of its 21 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 23 Dec 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.04599/) (2017)
- [Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.01507/) (2017)
- [Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.02142/) (2015)
- [CBAM: Convolutional Block Attention Module](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.06521/) (2018)
- [What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.04977/) (2017)
- [Gradient Starvation: A Learning Proclivity in Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.09468/) (2020)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Subsurface delaminations in reinforced concrete bridge decks escape conventional visual inspection, and the two principal sensing techniques used to find them are individually incomplete: Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) penetrates deeply but degrades near the surface, while Infrared Thermography (IRT) resolves shallow defects but cannot reach deeper structure. This paper presents a framework for fusing the two modalities through hierarchical attention: temporal self-attention over GPR A-scans, channel-spatial attention over IRT patches, and cross-modal multi-head attention with learnable modality embeddings, coupled with decomposed aleatoric/epistemic uncertainty estimation. Beyond the architecture itself, which is lightweight at approximately 0.53M parameters with a closed-form accounting of where capacity resides, we contribute an elementary formal analysis. Two-token cross-modal attention is shown to be exactly a bank of per-sample learned gates; a gradient-allocation proposition quantifies how class imbalance starves attention parameters of minority-class signal and how loss reweighting trades that starvation for gradient variance; and closed-form metric floors under majority-class collapse anchor a diagnostic divergence between ranking metrics (AUC) and thresholded metrics (F1). The analysis suggests that adaptively weighted fusion, precisely because its feature-selection policy is learned, may be distinctively vulnerable to the severe class imbalance typical of operational bridge decks; establishing whether and when this occurs is deferred to empirical evaluation.