# Exploring the features used for summary evaluation by Human and GPT

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.19620 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.19620/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 20 of its 27 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 22 Dec 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09675/) (2019)
- [G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.16634/) (2023)
- [BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.04696/) (2020)
- [BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.11520/) (2021)
- [SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.12626/) (2020)
- [Is ChatGPT a Good NLG Evaluator? A Preliminary Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.04048/) (2023)
- [MoverScore: Text Generation Evaluating with Contextualized Embeddings and Earth Mover Distance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.02622/) (2019)
- [An Empirical Study of LLM-as-a-Judge for LLM Evaluation: Fine-tuned Judge Model is not a General Substitute for GPT-4](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.02839/) (2024)
- [BLEU is Not Suitable for the Evaluation of Text Simplification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.05995/) (2018)
- [Improve LLM-as-a-Judge Ability as a General Ability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.11689/) (2025)
- [CTRLEval: An Unsupervised Reference-Free Metric for Evaluating Controlled Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.00862/) (2022)
- [Self-rationalization improves LLM as a fine-grained judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.05495/) (2024)
- [INSTRUCTSCORE: Explainable Text Generation Evaluation with Finegrained Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14282/) (2023)
- [Themis: A Reference-free NLG Evaluation Language Model with Flexibility and Interpretability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.18365/) (2024)
- [SMART: Sentences as Basic Units for Text Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.01030/) (2022)
- [Reassessing Extractive QA Datasets at Scale: LLM-as-a-Judge and In-Depth Analyses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.11972/) (2025)
- [Fusion-Eval: Integrating Assistant Evaluators with LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.09204/) (2023)
- [J1: Exploring Simple Test-Time Scaling for LLM-as-a-Judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.11875/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Summary assessment involves evaluating how well a generated summary reflects the key ideas and meaning of the source text, requiring a deep understanding of the content. Large Language Models (LLMs) have been used to automate this process, acting as judges to evaluate summaries with respect to the original text. While previous research investigated the alignment between LLMs and Human responses, it is not yet well understood what properties or features are exploited by them when asked to evaluate based on a particular quality dimension, and there has not been much attention towards mapping between evaluation scores and metrics. In this paper, we address this issue and discover features aligned with Human and Generative Pre-trained Transformers (GPTs) responses by studying statistical and machine learning metrics. Furthermore, we show that instructing GPTs to employ metrics used by Human can improve their judgment and conforming them better with human responses.