# Activations as Features: Probing LLMs for Generalizable Essay Scoring Representations

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.19456 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.19456/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 11 of its 28 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 22 Dec 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1301.3781/) (2013)
- [Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.03341/) (2023)
- [Steering Language Models With Activation Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.10248/) (2023)
- [Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advances](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.12452/) (2021)
- [The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in Large Language Model Representations of True/False Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06824/) (2023)
- [InferAligner: Inference-Time Alignment for Harmlessness through Cross-Model Guidance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.11206/) (2024)
- [Adaptive Activation Steering: A Tuning-Free LLM Truthfulness Improvement Method for Diverse Hallucinations Categories](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.00034/) (2024)
- [Prompt- and Trait Relation-aware Cross-prompt Essay Trait Scoring](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.16826/) (2023)
- [Prompt Agnostic Essay Scorer: A Domain Generalization Approach to Cross-prompt Automated Essay Scoring](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.01441/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Multilingual Embedding Probes Fail to Generalize Across Learner Corpora](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.07095/) (2026)
- [From Texts to Scores: Tracing the Emergence of Essay Quality Representations in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.20152/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Automated essay scoring (AES) is a challenging task in cross-prompt settings due to the diversity of scoring criteria. While previous studies have focused on the output of large language models (LLMs) to improve scoring accuracy, we believe activations from intermediate layers may also provide valuable information. To explore this possibility, we evaluated the discriminative power of LLMs' activations in cross-prompt essay scoring task. Specifically, we used activations to fit probes and further analyzed the effects of different models and input content of LLMs on this discriminative power. By computing the directions of essays across various trait dimensions under different prompts, we analyzed the variation in evaluation perspectives of large language models concerning essay types and traits. Results show that the activations possess strong discriminative power in evaluating essay quality and that LLMs can adapt their evaluation perspectives to different traits and essay types, effectively handling the diversity of scoring criteria in cross-prompt settings.