# Benchmarking Attribute Discrimination in Infant-Scale Vision-Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.18951 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.18951/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in MLLM training and visual instruction tuning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 7 of its 24 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 22 Dec 2025.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [MLLM training and visual instruction tuning](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/mllm-training-and-visual-instruction-tuning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.14294/) (2021)
- [Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.15343/) (2023)
- [Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.05431/) (2016)
- [ColorBench: Can VLMs See and Understand the Colorful World? A Comprehensive Benchmark for Color Perception, Reasoning, and Robustness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.10514/) (2025)
- [When are Lemons Purple? The Concept Association Bias of Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.12043/) (2022)
- [Discovering Hidden Visual Concepts Beyond Linguistic Input in Infant Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.05205/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Infants learn not only object categories but also fine-grained visual attributes such as color, size, and texture from limited experience. Prior infant-scale vision--language models have mainly been evaluated on object recognition, leaving open whether they support within-class attribute discrimination. We introduce a controlled benchmark that varies color, size, and texture across 67 everyday object classes using synthetic rendering to decouple attribute values from object identity. We evaluate infant-trained models (CVCL and an infant-trained DINO baseline) against web-scale and ImageNet models (CLIP, SigLIP, ResNeXt) under two complementary settings: an image-only prototype test and a text--vision test with attribute--object prompts. We find a dissociation between visual and linguistic attribute information: infant-trained models form strong visual representations for size and discriminate texture comparably to other models, but perform poorly on visual color discrimination, and in the text--vision setting they struggle to ground color and show only modest size grounding. In contrast, web-trained vision--language models strongly ground color from text while exhibiting weaker visual size discrimination.