# AVM: Towards Structure-Preserving Neural Response Modeling in the Visual Cortex Across Stimuli and Individuals

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.16948 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.16948/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 7 of its 31 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 Dec 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [Deep Neural Networks Rival the Representation of Primate IT Cortex for Core Visual Object Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1406.3284/) (2014)
- [Deep Learning Models of the Retinal Response to Natural Scenes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1702.01825/) (2017)
- [Neural system identification for large populations separating "what" and "where"](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.02653/) (2017)
- [Artificial neural networks for neuroscientists: A primer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.01001/) (2020)
- [The Sensorium competition on predicting large-scale mouse primary visual cortex activity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.08666/) (2022)
- [Factorized Neural Processes for Neural Processes: K-Shot Prediction of Neural Responses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11810/) (2020)
- [Deep Auto-encoder with Neural Response](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.15309/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

While deep learning models have shown strong performance in simulating neural responses, they often fail to clearly separate stable visual encoding from condition-specific adaptation, which limits their ability to generalize across stimuli and individuals. We introduce the Adaptive Visual Model (AVM), a structure-preserving framework that enables condition-aware adaptation through modular subnetworks, without modifying the core representation. AVM keeps a Vision Transformer-based encoder frozen to capture consistent visual features, while independently trained modulation paths account for neural response variations driven by stimulus content and subject identity. We evaluate AVM in three experimental settings, including stimulus-level variation, cross-subject generalization, and cross-dataset adaptation, all of which involve structured changes in inputs and individuals. Across two large-scale mouse V1 datasets, AVM outperforms the state-of-the-art V1T model by approximately 2% in predictive correlation, demonstrating robust generalization, interpretable condition-wise modulation, and high architectural efficiency. Specifically, AVM achieves a 9.1% improvement in explained variance (FEVE) under the cross-dataset adaptation setting. These results suggest that AVM provides a unified framework for adaptive neural modeling across biological and experimental conditions, offering a scalable solution under structural constraints. Its design may inform future approaches to cortical modeling in both neuroscience and biologically inspired AI systems.
