# Adversarial Robustness in Financial Machine Learning: Defenses, Economic Impact, and Governance Evidence

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.15780 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.15780/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 6 of its 11 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Dec 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6572/) (2014)
- [Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.06083/) (2017)
- [On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.04599/) (2017)
- [Explaining by Removing: A Unified Framework for Model Explanation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.14878/) (2020)
- [Adversarial vulnerability for any classifier](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.08686/) (2018)
- [Evasion and Hardening of Tree Ensemble Classifiers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1509.07892/) (2015)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We evaluate adversarial robustness in tabular machine learning models used in financial decision making. Using credit scoring and fraud detection data, we apply gradient based attacks and measure impacts on discrimination, calibration, and financial risk metrics. Results show notable performance degradation under small perturbations and partial recovery through adversarial training.
