# Towards Proactive Personalization through Profile Customization for Individual Users in Dialogues

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.15302 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.15302/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 21 of its 34 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 Dec 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.06180/) (2023)
- [HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.19256/) (2024)
- [Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yet](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01798/) (2023)
- [MINT: Evaluating LLMs in Multi-turn Interaction with Tools and Language Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.10691/) (2023)
- [Personalized Soups: Personalized Large Language Model Alignment via Post-hoc Parameter Merging](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.11564/) (2023)
- [Large Language Model Alignment: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.15025/) (2023)
- [Do LLMs Recognize Your Preferences? Evaluating Personalized Preference Following in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.09597/) (2025)
- [On Memory Construction and Retrieval for Personalized Conversational Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.05589/) (2025)
- [Deep Reinforcement Learning for Multi-objective Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.02386/) (2019)
- [Aligning LLMs with Individual Preferences via Interaction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.03642/) (2024)
- [PAD: Personalized Alignment of LLMs at Decoding-Time](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.04070/) (2024)
- [Teaching Language Models to Evolve with Users: Dynamic Profile Modeling for Personalized Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.15456/) (2025)
- [MAP: Multi-Human-Value Alignment Palette](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.19198/) (2024)
- [Open-Domain Hierarchical Event Schema Induction by Incremental Prompting and Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.01972/) (2023)
- [Whose Boat Does it Float? Improving Personalization in Preference Tuning via Inferred User Personas](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.11549/) (2025)
- [Persona-judge: Personalized Alignment of Large Language Models via Token-level Self-judgment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.12663/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [PERMA: Benchmarking Personalized Memory Agents via Event-Driven Preference and Realistic Task Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.23231/) (2026)
- [TrajWiki: Source-Grounded Memory Trajectories for Long-Horizon Dialogue Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.00967/) (2026)
- [Learning to Adapt Cross-Domain Preferences via Meta-LoRA for LLM Personalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.12389/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) in interactive systems necessitates a deep alignment with the nuanced and dynamic preferences of individual users. Current alignment techniques predominantly address universal human values or static, single-turn preferences, thereby failing to address the critical needs of long-term personalization and the initial user cold-start problem. To bridge this gap, we propose PersonalAgent, a novel user-centric lifelong agent designed to continuously infer and adapt to user preferences. PersonalAgent constructs and dynamically refines a unified user profile by decomposing dialogues into single-turn interactions, framing preference inference as a sequential decision-making task. Experiments show that PersonalAgent achieves superior performance over strong prompt-based and policy optimization baselines, not only in idealized but also in noisy conversational contexts, while preserving cross-session preference consistency. Furthermore, human evaluation confirms that PersonalAgent excels at capturing user preferences naturally and coherently. Our findings underscore the importance of lifelong personalization for developing more inclusive and adaptive conversational agents. Our code is available here.