# Reasoning-Style Poisoning of LLM Agents via Stealthy Style Transfer: Process-Level Attacks and Runtime Monitoring in RSV Space

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.14448 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.14448/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 6 of its 15 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 16 Dec 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reasoning for agents, planning and code](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reasoning-for-agents-planning-and-code/)
- LLM agents and tool use / [Agent threats, guardrails and governance](https://mlsanity.com/agents/agent-threats-guardrails-and-governance/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Let's Verify Step by Step](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.20050/) (2023)
- [Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.15043/) (2023)
- [Identifying the Risks of LM Agents with an LM-Emulated Sandbox](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.15817/) (2023)
- [BadRAG: Identifying Vulnerabilities in Retrieval Augmented Generation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.00083/) (2024)
- [Knowledge-Augmented Language Model Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.12836/) (2023)
- [ClusT3: Information Invariant Test-Time Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.12345/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [OEP: Poisoning Self-Evolving LLM Agents via Locally Correct but Non-Transferable Experiences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.18930/) (2026)
- [CoTDeceptor:Adversarial Code Obfuscation Against CoT-Enhanced LLM Code Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.21250/) (2025)
- [Proof-of-Execution Memory: Defending LLM Agents Against Forged-Reasoning Attacks by Verifying What Actually Happened](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.16032/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Model (LLM) agents relying on external retrieval are increasingly deployed in high-stakes environments. While existing adversarial attacks primarily focus on content falsification or instruction injection, we identify a novel, process-oriented attack surface: the agent's reasoning style. We propose Reasoning-Style Poisoning (RSP), a paradigm that manipulates how agents process information rather than what they process. We introduce Generative Style Injection (GSI), an attack method that rewrites retrieved documents into pathological tones--specifically "analysis paralysis" or "cognitive haste"--without altering underlying facts or using explicit triggers. To quantify these shifts, we develop the Reasoning Style Vector (RSV), a metric tracking Verification depth, Self-confidence, and Attention focus. Experiments on HotpotQA and FEVER using ReAct, Reflection, and Tree of Thoughts (ToT) architectures reveal that GSI significantly degrades performance. It increases reasoning steps by up to 4.4 times or induces premature errors, successfully bypassing state-of-the-art content filters. Finally, we propose RSP-M, a lightweight runtime monitor that calculates RSV metrics in real-time and triggers alerts when values exceed safety thresholds. Our work demonstrates that reasoning style is a distinct, exploitable vulnerability, necessitating process-level defenses beyond static content analysis.