# Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for Microseismic Phase Picking Using a Neural Operator

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.13197 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.13197/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 4 of its 23 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 15 Dec 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistry](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.01212/) (2017)
- [Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.08895/) (2020)
- [Neural Operator: Graph Kernel Network for Partial Differential Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.03485/) (2020)
- [OKSP: A Novel Deep Learning Automatic Event Detection Pipeline for Seismic Monitoringin Costa Rica](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.02723/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Seismic phase picking is fundamental for microseismic monitoring and subsurface imaging. Manual processing is impractical for real-time applications and large sensor arrays, motivating the use of deep learning-based pickers trained on extensive earthquake catalogs. On a broader scale, these models are generally tuned to perform optimally in high signal-to-noise and long-duration networks and often fail to perform satisfactorily when applied to campaign-based microseismic datasets, which are characterized by low signal-to-noise ratios, sparse geometries, and limited labeled data. In this study, we present a microseismic adaptation of a network-wide earthquake phase picker, Phase Neural Operator (PhaseNO), using transfer learning and parameter-efficient fine-tuning. Starting from a model pre-trained on more than 57,000 three-component earthquake and noise records, we fine-tune it using only 200 labeled and noisy microseismic recordings from hydraulic fracturing settings. We present a parameter-efficient adaptation of PhaseNO that fine-tunes a small fraction of its parameters (only 3.6%) while retaining its global spatiotemporal representations learned from a large dataset of earthquake recordings. We then evaluate our adapted model on three independent microseismic datasets and compare its performance against the original pre-trained PhaseNO, a STA/LTA-based workflow, and two state-of-the-art deep learning models, PhaseNet and EQTransformer. We demonstrate that our adapted model significantly outperforms the original PhaseNO in F1 and accuracy metrics, achieving up to 30% absolute improvements in all test sets and consistently performing better than STA/LTA and state-of-the-art models. With our adaptation being based on a small calibration set, our proposed workflow is a practical and efficient tool to deploy network-wide models in data-limited microseismic applications.