# Detecting Prompt Injection Attacks Against Application Using Classifiers

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.12583 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.12583/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Prompt injection and agent security, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security.
- Builds on 9 of its 14 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Dec 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM safety and security / [Prompt injection and agent security](https://mlsanity.com/safety/prompt-injection-and-agent-security/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.05250/) (2016)
- [Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuAD](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.03822/) (2018)
- [Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.12173/) (2023)
- [Ignore Previous Prompt: Attack Techniques For Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.09527/) (2022)
- [Multi-step Jailbreaking Privacy Attacks on ChatGPT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.05197/) (2023)
- [From ChatGPT to ThreatGPT: Impact of Generative AI in Cybersecurity and Privacy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.00691/) (2023)
- [From Prompt Injections to SQL Injection Attacks: How Protected is Your LLM-Integrated Web Application?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.01990/) (2023)
- [SelQA: A New Benchmark for Selection-based Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.08513/) (2016)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [CrackedPDFs: A Controlled Benchmark for Hidden Prompt Injection in PDFs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.19396/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Prompt injection attacks can compromise the security and stability of critical systems, from infrastructure to large web applications. This work curates and augments a prompt injection dataset based on the HackAPrompt Playground Submissions corpus and trains several classifiers, including LSTM, feed forward neural networks, Random Forest, and Naive Bayes, to detect malicious prompts in LLM integrated web applications. The proposed approach improves prompt injection detection and mitigation, helping protect targeted applications and systems.
