# Reliable Policy Iteration: Performance Robustness Across Architecture and Environment Perturbations

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.12088 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.12088/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 6 of its 10 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 12 Dec 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1509.02971/) (2015)
- [Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.09477/) (2018)
- [Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1509.06461/) (2015)
- [Understanding the Pathologies of Approximate Policy Evaluation when Combined with Greedification in Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.15268/) (2020)
- [Does DQN Learn?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.13617/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In a recent work, we proposed Reliable Policy Iteration (RPI), that restores policy iteration's monotonicity-of-value-estimates property to the function approximation setting. Here, we assess the robustness of RPI's empirical performance on two classical control tasks -- CartPole and Inverted Pendulum -- under changes to neural network and environmental parameters. Relative to DQN, Double DQN, DDPG, TD3, and PPO, RPI reaches near-optimal performance early and sustains this policy as training proceeds. Because deep RL methods are often hampered by sample inefficiency, training instability, and hyperparameter sensitivity, our results highlight RPI's promise as a more reliable alternative.