# Extending a Parliamentary Corpus with MPs' Tweets: Automatic Annotation and Evaluation Using MultiParTweet

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.11567 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.11567/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 17 of its 64 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 12 Dec 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.10084/) (2019)
- [A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07874/) (2017)
- [TweetEval: Unified Benchmark and Comparative Evaluation for Tweet Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.12421/) (2020)
- [SemEval-2017 Task 4: Sentiment Analysis in Twitter](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.00741/) (2019)
- [SemEval-2019 Task 6: Identifying and Categorizing Offensive Language in Social Media (OffensEval)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.08983/) (2019)
- [XLM-T: Multilingual Language Models in Twitter for Sentiment Analysis and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.12250/) (2021)
- [TweetNLP: Cutting-Edge Natural Language Processing for Social Media](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.14774/) (2022)
- [Hate Towards the Political Opponent: A Twitter Corpus Study of the 2020 US Elections on the Basis of Offensive Speech and Stance Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.01664/) (2021)
- [Twitter as a Lifeline: Human-annotated Twitter Corpora for NLP of Crisis-related Messages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1605.05894/) (2016)
- [GoodNewsEveryone: A Corpus of News Headlines Annotated with Emotions, Semantic Roles, and Reader Perception](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.03184/) (2019)
- [Learning from Crowds with Crowd-Kit](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.08584/) (2021)
- [TWIGMA: A dataset of AI-Generated Images with Metadata From Twitter](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.08310/) (2023)
- [Crowdbreaks: Tracking Health Trends using Public Social Media Data and Crowdsourcing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.05491/) (2018)
- [LLM Teacher-Student Framework for Text Classification With No Manually Annotated Data: A Case Study in IPTC News Topic Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.19638/) (2024)
- [M2SA: Multimodal and Multilingual Model for Sentiment Analysis of Tweets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.01753/) (2024)
- [ILiAD: An Interactive Corpus for Linguistic Annotated Data from Twitter Posts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.15374/) (2024)
- [Meme Similarity and Emotion Detection using Multimodal Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.17493/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Learning to Detect Cross-Modal Negation: An Analysis of Latent Representations and an Attention-Based Solution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.17712/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Social media serves as a critical medium in modern politics because it both reflects politicians' ideologies and facilitates communication with younger generations. We present MultiParTweet, a multilingual tweet corpus from X that connects politicians' social media discourse with German political corpus GerParCor, thereby enabling comparative analyses between online communication and parliamentary debates. MultiParTweet contains 39 546 tweets, including 19 056 media items. Furthermore, we enriched the annotation with nine text-based models and one vision-language model (VLM) to annotate MultiParTweet with emotion, sentiment, and topic annotations. Moreover, the automated annotations are evaluated against a manually annotated subset. MultiParTweet can be reconstructed using our tool, TTLABTweetCrawler, which provides a framework for collecting data from X. To demonstrate a methodological demonstration, we examine whether the models can predict each other using the outputs of the remaining models. In summary, we provide MultiParTweet, a resource integrating automatic text and media-based annotations validated with human annotations, and TTLABTweetCrawler, a general-purpose X data collection tool. Our analysis shows that the models are mutually predictable. In addition, VLM-based annotation were preferred by human annotators, suggesting that multimodal representations align more with human interpretation.