# Guided Transfer Learning for Discrete Diffusion Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.10877 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.10877/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Discrete and text diffusion, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models.
- Builds on 32 of its 38 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Dec 2025.

## Placed in

- Diffusion models / [Discrete and text diffusion](https://mlsanity.com/diffusion/discrete-and-text-diffusion/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 32)

- [Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11239/) (2020)
- [Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.13456/) (2020)
- [Scalable Diffusion Models with Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.09748/) (2022)
- [Structured Denoising Diffusion Models in Discrete State-Spaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03006/) (2021)
- [Diffusion-LM Improves Controllable Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.14217/) (2022)
- [Simple and Effective Masked Diffusion Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.07524/) (2024)
- [Discrete Diffusion Modeling by Estimating the Ratios of the Data Distribution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.16834/) (2023)
- [Simplified and Generalized Masked Diffusion for Discrete Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.04329/) (2024)
- [AudioLDM: Text-to-Audio Generation with Latent Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.12503/) (2023)
- [MAUVE: Measuring the Gap Between Neural Text and Human Text using Divergence Frontiers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.01454/) (2021)
- [A Continuous Time Framework for Discrete Denoising Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.14987/) (2022)
- [Directly Fine-Tuning Diffusion Models on Differentiable Rewards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.17400/) (2023)
- [Scaling Diffusion Language Models via Adaptation from Autoregressive Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.17891/) (2024)
- [Masked Diffusion Models are Secretly Time-Agnostic Masked Models and Exploit Inaccurate Categorical Sampling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.02908/) (2024)
- [Scaling up Masked Diffusion Models on Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.18514/) (2024)
- [Remasking Discrete Diffusion Models with Inference-Time Scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.00307/) (2025)
- [Score-based Continuous-time Discrete Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.16750/) (2022)
- [Simple Guidance Mechanisms for Discrete Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.10193/) (2024)
- [Concrete Score Matching: Generalized Score Matching for Discrete Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.00802/) (2022)
- [Beyond Autoregression: Discrete Diffusion for Complex Reasoning and Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.14157/) (2024)
- [Patch Diffusion: Faster and More Data-Efficient Training of Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.12526/) (2023)
- [Unlocking Guidance for Discrete State-Space Diffusion and Flow Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.01572/) (2024)
- [Latent Diffusion for Language Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.09462/) (2022)
- [Energy-Based Diffusion Language Models for Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.21357/) (2024)
- [DiffFit: Unlocking Transferability of Large Diffusion Models via Simple Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.06648/) (2023)
- [Path Planning for Masked Diffusion Model Sampling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.03540/) (2025)
- [Think While You Generate: Discrete Diffusion with Planned Denoising](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.06264/) (2024)
- [Discrete Diffusion in Large Language and Multimodal Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.13759/) (2025)
- [TESS 2: A Large-Scale Generalist Diffusion Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13917/) (2025)
- [CtrlDiff: Boosting Large Diffusion Language Models with Dynamic Block Prediction and Controllable Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.14455/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [On the Limits of Latent Reuse in Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.13448/) (2026)
- [Robustness of Diffusion Models under Distribution Shift](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.27546/) (2026)
- [Ambient Discrete Diffusion: Using the Wrong Data at the Right Time for Data Efficient Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.12340/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Discrete diffusion models (DMs) have achieved strong performance in language and other discrete domains, offering a compelling alternative to autoregressive modeling. Yet this performance typically depends on large training datasets, challenging the performance of DMs in small-data regimes -- common under real-world constraints. Aimed at this challenge, recent work in continuous DMs suggests that transfer learning via classifier ratio-based guidance can adapt a pretrained DM to a related target distribution, often outperforming alternatives such as full-weight fine-tuning on the target data. By contrast, transfer learning for discrete DMs remains unexplored. We address this gap by exploring practical analogues of ratio-based transfer learning for discrete DMs. Our theoretical analysis shows that a direct extension of existing ratio-based guidance is computationally prohibitive, scaling with vocabulary size. To overcome this limitation, we introduce a scheduling mechanism that yields a practical algorithm, Guided Transfer Learning for discrete diffusion models (GTL). GTL enables sampling from a target distribution without modifying the pretrained denoiser and reduces the cost to linear scaling in vocabulary size, which in turn supports longer sequence generation. We evaluate GTL on sequential data, including synthetic Markov chains and language modeling tasks, and provide a detailed empirical analysis of its behavior. The results highlight a clear trade-off: when target datasets are large, weight fine-tuning is often preferable, whereas GTL becomes increasingly effective as target data shrinks. Finally, we experimentally demonstrate a key failure mode of GTL: when the source and target distributions overlap poorly, the ratio-based classifier required for guidance becomes unreliable, limiting transfer performance.