# Renormalizable Spectral-Shell Dynamics as the Origin of Neural Scaling Laws

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.10427 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.10427/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 28 of its 42 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Dec 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 28 of 28)

- [Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.08361/) (2020)
- [Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.15556/) (2022)
- [Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.07572/) (2018)
- [Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.07682/) (2022)
- [Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Coding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1510.00149/) (2015)
- [GPTQ: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Generative Pre-trained Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.17323/) (2022)
- [On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minima](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.04836/) (2016)
- [On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.08734/) (2018)
- [SNIP: Single-shot Network Pruning based on Connection Sensitivity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.02340/) (2018)
- [Wide Neural Networks of Any Depth Evolve as Linear Models Under Gradient Descent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.06720/) (2019)
- [Up or Down? Adaptive Rounding for Post-Training Quantization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.10568/) (2020)
- [What is the State of Neural Network Pruning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.03033/) (2020)
- [Deep Learning Scaling is Predictable, Empirically](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.00409/) (2017)
- [Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.14486/) (2022)
- [Scaling Laws for Autoregressive Generative Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.14701/) (2020)
- [Picking Winning Tickets Before Training by Preserving Gradient Flow](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.07376/) (2020)
- [8-bit Optimizers via Block-wise Quantization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.02861/) (2021)
- [An Investigation into Neural Net Optimization via Hessian Eigenvalue Density](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.10159/) (2019)
- [On the Inductive Bias of Neural Tangent Kernels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.12173/) (2019)
- [A Dynamical Model of Neural Scaling Laws](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01092/) (2024)
- [Scaling Laws for Precision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.04330/) (2024)
- [How Feature Learning Can Improve Neural Scaling Laws](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.17858/) (2024)
- [From Lazy to Rich: Exact Learning Dynamics in Deep Linear Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.14623/) (2024)
- [Feature-Learning Networks Are Consistent Across Widths At Realistic Scales](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18411/) (2023)
- [Densing Law of LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.04315/) (2024)
- [On the Predictability of Pruning Across Scales](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.10621/) (2020)
- [Spectral Evolution and Invariance in Linear-width Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.06506/) (2022)
- [A Generalized Spectral Framework to Expain Neural Scaling and Compression Dynamics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.07892/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Neural scaling laws and double-descent phenomena suggest that deep-network training obeys a simple macroscopic structure despite highly nonlinear optimization dynamics. We derive such structure directly from gradient descent in function space. For mean-squared error loss, the training error evolves as dot et=-M(t)et with M(t)=Jθ(t)Jθ(t)!*, a time-dependent self-adjoint operator induced by the network Jacobian. Using Kato perturbation theory, we obtain an exact system of coupled modewise ODEs in the instantaneous eigenbasis of M(t). To extract macroscopic behavior, we introduce a logarithmic spectral-shell coarse-graining and track quadratic error energy across shells. Microscopic interactions within each shell cancel identically at the energy level, so shell energies evolve only through dissipation and external inter-shell interactions. We formalize this via a renormalizable shell-dynamics assumption, under which cumulative microscopic effects reduce to a controlled net flux across shell boundaries. Assuming an effective power-law spectral transport in a relevant resolution range, the shell dynamics admits a self-similar solution with a moving resolution frontier and explicit scaling exponents. This framework explains neural scaling laws and double descent, and unifies lazy (NTK-like) training and feature learning as two limits of the same spectral-shell dynamics.
