# FALCON: Few-step Accurate Likelihoods for Continuous Flows

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.09914 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.09914/

## Key facts

- Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 49 of its 60 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Dec 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 49)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.13456/) (2020)
- [Scalable Diffusion Models with Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.09748/) (2022)
- [Flow Matching for Generative Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.02747/) (2022)
- [Neural Ordinary Differential Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.07366/) (2018)
- [Elucidating the Design Space of Diffusion-Based Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.00364/) (2022)
- [Variational Inference with Normalizing Flows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.05770/) (2015)
- [Density estimation using Real NVP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1605.08803/) (2016)
- [Consistency Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.01469/) (2023)
- [Building Normalizing Flows with Stochastic Interpolants](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.15571/) (2022)
- [Improving and generalizing flow-based generative models with minibatch optimal transport](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.00482/) (2023)
- [SiT: Exploring Flow and Diffusion-based Generative Models with Scalable Interpolant Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.08740/) (2024)
- [FFJORD: Free-form Continuous Dynamics for Scalable Reversible Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.01367/) (2018)
- [Mean Flows for One-step Generative Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.13447/) (2025)
- [Improved Techniques for Training Consistency Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.14189/) (2023)
- [One Step Diffusion via Shortcut Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.12557/) (2024)
- [Learning from Protein Structure with Geometric Vector Perceptrons](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.01411/) (2020)
- [Rectified Flow: A Marginal Preserving Approach to Optimal Transport](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.14577/) (2022)
- [Multisample Flow Matching: Straightening Flows with Minibatch Couplings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.14772/) (2023)
- [Equivariant Flows: Exact Likelihood Generative Learning for Symmetric Densities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.02425/) (2020)
- [Path Integral Sampler: a stochastic control approach for sampling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.15141/) (2021)
- [Diffusion Schr"odinger Bridge Matching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.16852/) (2023)
- [Denoising Diffusion Samplers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13834/) (2023)
- [Consistency Models Made Easy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.14548/) (2024)
- [Equivariant flow matching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.15030/) (2023)
- [Flow Annealed Importance Sampling Bootstrap](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.01893/) (2022)
- [Iterated Denoising Energy Matching for Sampling from Boltzmann Densities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.06121/) (2024)
- [Flow map matching with stochastic interpolants: A mathematical framework for consistency models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.07507/) (2024)
- [How to build a consistency model: Learning flow maps via self-distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.18825/) (2025)
- [Align Your Flow: Scaling Continuous-Time Flow Map Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.14603/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 13 of 13)

- [Riemannian MeanFlow](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.07744/) (2026)
- [Boltzmann generators for amorphous particle systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.16607/) (2025)
- [Strong Stochastic Flow Maps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.01086/) (2026)
- [Assessing generative modeling approaches for free energy estimates in condensed matter](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.23930/) (2025)
- [Efficient Training of Boltzmann Generators Using Off-Policy Log-Dispersion Regularization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.03729/) (2026)
- [Towards accurate extreme event likelihoods from diffusion model climate emulators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.03802/) (2026)
- [Few-Step Boltzmann Generators via Scalable Likelihood Flow Maps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.29110/) (2026)
- [Boltzmann Generators for Condensed Matter via Riemannian Flow Matching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.18482/) (2026)
- [Autoregressive Boltzmann Generators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.27361/) (2026)
- [OMatG-flash: An All-Atom Flow Map with Reinforce Adjoint Matching for Scalable Materials Discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.26402/) (2026)
- [Coarse-Grained Boltzmann Generators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.10637/) (2026)
- [StAD: Stein Amortized Divergence for Fast Likelihoods with Diffusion and Flow](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.16486/) (2026)
- [PrT-Flow: Probability-Tractable Flow Matching for Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.17667/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Scalable sampling of molecular states in thermodynamic equilibrium is a long-standing challenge in statistical physics. Boltzmann Generators tackle this problem by pairing a generative model, capable of exact likelihood computation, with importance sampling to obtain consistent samples under the target distribution. Current Boltzmann Generators primarily use continuous normalizing flows (CNFs) trained with flow matching for efficient training of powerful models. However, likelihood calculation for these models is extremely costly, requiring thousands of function evaluations per sample, severely limiting their adoption. In this work, we propose Few-step Accurate Likelihoods for Continuous Flows (FALCON), a method which allows for few-step sampling with a likelihood accurate enough for importance sampling applications by introducing a hybrid training objective that encourages invertibility. We show FALCON outperforms state-of-the-art normalizing flow models for molecular Boltzmann sampling and is two orders of magnitude faster than the equivalently performing CNF model.
