# Analyzing Planner Design Trade-offs for MAPF under ADG-based Realistic Execution

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.09736 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.09736/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 11 of its 24 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Dec 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [Multi-Agent Pathfinding: Definitions, Variants, and Benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.08291/) (2019)
- [Searching with Consistent Prioritization for Multi-Agent Path Finding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.06356/) (2018)
- [EECBS: A Bounded-Suboptimal Search for Multi-Agent Path Finding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.01367/) (2020)
- [Feasibility Study: Moving Non-Homogeneous Teams in Congested Video Game Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.01447/) (2017)
- [Pairwise Symmetry Reasoning for Multi-Agent Path Finding Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.07116/) (2021)
- [Multi-Agent Motion Planning For Differential Drive Robots Through Stationary State Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.13359/) (2024)
- [Multi-Agent Motion Planning with B'ezier Curve Optimization under Kinodynamic Constraints](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.14145/) (2023)
- [Bidirectional Temporal Plan Graph: Enabling Switchable Passing Orders for More Efficient Multi-Agent Path Finding Plan Execution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.00315/) (2023)
- [Speedup Techniques for Switchable Temporal Plan Graph Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.15908/) (2024)
- [Receding Horizon Re-ordering of Multi-Agent Execution Schedules](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.04190/) (2023)
- [Advancing MAPF Toward the Real World: A Scalable Multi-Agent Realistic Testbed (SMART)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.04798/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF) algorithms are increasingly deployed in industrial warehouses and automated manufacturing facilities, where robots must operate reliably under real-world physical constraints. However, existing MAPF evaluation frameworks typically rely on simplified robot models, leaving a substantial gap between algorithmic benchmarks and practical performance. Recent frameworks such as SMART combine kinodynamic modeling with execution based on the Action Dependency Graph (ADG), enabling realistic, large-scale MAPF evaluation. Building on this capability, this work investigates how key planner design choices influence performance under realistic execution settings. We systematically study three fundamental factors: (1) the relationship between solution optimality and execution performance, (2) the sensitivity of system performance to inaccuracies in kinodynamic modeling, and (3) the tradeoff between model accuracy and plan optimality. Empirically, we examine these factors to understand how these design choices affect performance in realistic scenarios. We highlight open challenges and research directions to steer the community toward practical, real-world deployment.