# SpeechQualityLLM: LLM-Based Multimodal Assessment of Speech Quality

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.08238 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.08238/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 6 of its 12 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Dec 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.04356/) (2022)
- [SDR - half-baked or well done?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.02508/) (2018)
- [NISQA: A Deep CNN-Self-Attention Model for Multidimensional Speech Quality Prediction with Crowdsourced Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.09494/) (2021)
- [DNSMOS P.835: A Non-Intrusive Perceptual Objective Speech Quality Metric to Evaluate Noise Suppressors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.01763/) (2021)
- [Spark-TTS: An Efficient LLM-Based Text-to-Speech Model with Single-Stream Decoupled Speech Tokens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.01710/) (2025)
- [Audio-Visual LLM for Video Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.06720/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [JASTIN: Aligning LLMs for Zero-Shot Audio and Speech Evaluation via Natural Language Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.04505/) (2026)
- [Calibration-Reasoning Framework for Descriptive Speech Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.10175/) (2026)
- [A Reliability Assessment of LALM Audio Judges for Full-Duplex Voice Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.07985/) (2026)
- [Beyond Naturalness: Probing Automated Text-To-Speech Evaluators on Linguistically Grounded Dimensions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.09930/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Objective speech quality assessment is central to telephony, VoIP, and streaming systems, where large volumes of degraded audio must be monitored and optimized at scale. Classical metrics such as PESQ and POLQA approximate human mean opinion scores (MOS) but require carefully controlled conditions and expensive listening tests, while learning-based models such as NISQA regress MOS and multiple perceptual dimensions from waveforms or spectrograms, achieving high correlation with subjective ratings yet remaining rigid: they do not support interactive, natural-language queries and do not natively provide textual rationales. In this work, we introduce SpeechQualityLLM, a multimodal speech quality question-answering (QA) system that couples an audio encoder with a language model and is trained on the NISQA corpus using template-based question-answer pairs covering overall MOS and four perceptual dimensions (noisiness, coloration, discontinuity, and loudness) in both single-ended (degraded only) and double-ended (degraded plus clean reference) setups. Instead of directly regressing scores, our system is supervised to generate textual answers from which numeric predictions are parsed and evaluated with standard regression and ranking metrics; on held-out NISQA clips, the double-ended model attains a MOS mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.41 with Pearson correlation of 0.86, with competitive performance on dimension-wise tasks. Beyond these quantitative gains, it offers a flexible natural-language interface in which the language model acts as an audio quality expert: practitioners can query arbitrary aspects of degradations, prompt the model to emulate different listener profiles to capture human variability and produce diverse but plausible judgments rather than a single deterministic score, and thereby reduce reliance on large-scale crowdsourced tests and their monetary cost.