# Improving the Sensitivity of Backdoor Detectors via Class Subspace Orthogonalization

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.08129 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.08129/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 22 of its 35 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Dec 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11929/) (2020)
- [Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.1556/) (2014)
- [ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.0575/) (2014)
- [MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.04861/) (2017)
- [Fine-Pruning: Defending Against Backdooring Attacks on Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.12185/) (2018)
- [Spectral Signatures in Backdoor Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.00636/) (2018)
- [Reflection Backdoor: A Natural Backdoor Attack on Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.02343/) (2020)
- [Input-Aware Dynamic Backdoor Attack](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.08138/) (2020)
- [Label-Consistent Backdoor Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.02771/) (2019)
- [A new Backdoor Attack in CNNs by training set corruption without label poisoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.11237/) (2019)
- [Clean-Label Backdoor Attacks on Video Recognition Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.03030/) (2020)
- [Backdoor Defense via Decoupling the Training Process](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.03423/) (2022)
- [Narcissus: A Practical Clean-Label Backdoor Attack with Limited Information](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.05255/) (2022)
- [Sleeper Agent: Scalable Hidden Trigger Backdoors for Neural Networks Trained from Scratch](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.08970/) (2021)
- [BppAttack: Stealthy and Efficient Trojan Attacks against Deep Neural Networks via Image Quantization and Contrastive Adversarial Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.13383/) (2022)
- [Bypassing Backdoor Detection Algorithms in Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.13409/) (2019)
- [MM-BD: Post-Training Detection of Backdoor Attacks with Arbitrary Backdoor Pattern Types Using a Maximum Margin Statistic](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.06900/) (2022)
- [UNICORN: A Unified Backdoor Trigger Inversion Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.02786/) (2023)
- [Rethinking the Reverse-engineering of Trojan Triggers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.15127/) (2022)
- [CLIBE: Detecting Dynamic Backdoors in Transformer-based NLP Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.01193/) (2024)
- [CEPA: Consensus Embedded Perturbation for Agnostic Detection and Inversion of Backdoors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.02034/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [A Novel Latent-Class Attack and its Detection by Class Subspace Orthogonalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.29112/) (2026)
- [CSO-LLM: Class Subspace Orthogonalization for Post-Training Backdoor Detection and Trigger Inversion in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.31309/) (2026)
- [VISTA: Auditing Semantic Divergence in Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.02995/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Most post-training backdoor detection methods rely on attacked models exhibiting extreme outlier detection statistics for the target class of an attack, compared to non-target classes. However, these approaches may fail: (1) when some (non-target) classes are easily discriminable from all others, in which case they may naturally achieve extreme detection statistics (e.g., decision confidence); and (2) when the backdoor is subtle, i.e., with its features weak relative to intrinsic class-discriminative features. A key observation is that the backdoor target class has contributions to its detection statistic from both the backdoor trigger and from its intrinsic features, whereas non-target classes only have contributions from their intrinsic features. To achieve more sensitive detectors, we thus propose to suppress intrinsic features while optimizing the detection statistic for a given class. For non-target classes, such suppression will drastically reduce the achievable statistic, whereas for the target class the (significant) contribution from the backdoor trigger remains. In practice, we formulate a constrained optimization problem, leveraging a small set of clean examples from a given class, and optimizing the detection statistic while orthogonalizing with respect to the class's intrinsic features. We dub this plug-and-play approach Class Subspace Orthogonalization (CSO) and assess it against challenging mixed-label and adaptive attacks.
