# Multi-Docker-Eval: A `Shovel of the Gold Rush' Benchmark on Automatic Environment Building for Software Engineering

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.06915 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.06915/

## Key facts

- Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 7 Dec 2025.

## Built on by (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [LongCLI-Bench: A Preliminary Benchmark and Study for Long-horizon Agentic Programming in Command-Line Interfaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.14337/) (2026)
- [SWE-Universe: Scale Real-World Verifiable Environments to Millions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.02361/) (2026)
- [EvoConfig: Self-Evolving Multi-Agent Systems for Efficient Autonomous Environment Configuration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.16489/) (2026)
- [SWE-Hub: A Unified Production System for Scalable, Executable Software Engineering Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.00575/) (2026)
- [DockSmith: Scaling Reliable Coding Environments via an Agentic Docker Builder](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.00592/) (2026)
- [ResearchEnvBench: Benchmarking Agents on Environment Synthesis for Research Code Execution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.06739/) (2026)
- [FDE-Bench: Evaluating LLM Agents for Deployment Environment Configuration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.27571/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Automated environment configuration is a critical bottleneck in scaling software engineering (SWE) automation. To provide a reliable evaluation standard for this task, we present Multi-Docker-Eval benchmark. It includes 40 real-world repositories spanning 9 programming languages and measures both success in achieving executable states and efficiency under realistic constraints. Our extensive evaluation of state-of-the-art LLMs and agent frameworks reveals key insights: (1) the overall success rate of current models is low (F2P at most 37.7%), with environment construction being the primary bottleneck; (2) model size and reasoning length are not decisive factors, and open-source models like DeepSeek-V3.1 and Kimi-K2 are competitive in both efficiency and effectiveness; (3) agent framework and programming language also have significantly influence on success rate. These findings provide actionable guidelines for building scalable, fully automated SWE pipelines.