# DAComp: Benchmarking Data Agents across the Full Data Intelligence Lifecycle

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.04324 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.04324/

## Key facts

- Cited by 23 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 33 of its 41 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 Dec 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Web, search, and research agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/web-search-and-research-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 33)

- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06770/) (2023)
- [τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12045/) (2024)
- [Mind2Web: Towards a Generalist Agent for the Web](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.06070/) (2023)
- [OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.07972/) (2024)
- [Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Task](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.08887/) (2018)
- [OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.16741/) (2024)
- [Can LLM Already Serve as A Database Interface? A BIg Bench for Large-Scale Database Grounded Text-to-SQLs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.03111/) (2023)
- [BrowseComp: A Simple Yet Challenging Benchmark for Browsing Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.12516/) (2025)
- [Humanity's Last Exam](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.14249/) (2025)
- [MLE-bench: Evaluating Machine Learning Agents on Machine Learning Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.07095/) (2024)
- [AndroidWorld: A Dynamic Benchmarking Environment for Autonomous Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.14573/) (2024)
- [LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.05579/) (2024)
- [DS-1000: A Natural and Reliable Benchmark for Data Science Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.11501/) (2022)
- [HealthBench: Evaluating Large Language Models Towards Improved Human Health](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.08775/) (2025)
- [DeepResearch Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Deep Research Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.11763/) (2025)
- [ScienceAgentBench: Toward Rigorous Assessment of Language Agents for Data-Driven Scientific Discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.05080/) (2024)
- [Spider 2.0: Evaluating Language Models on Real-World Enterprise Text-to-SQL Workflows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.07763/) (2024)
- [Multi-SWE-bench: A Multilingual Benchmark for Issue Resolving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.02605/) (2025)
- [InfiAgent-DABench: Evaluating Agents on Data Analysis Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.05507/) (2024)
- [WritingBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Generative Writing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.05244/) (2025)
- [Natural Language to Code Generation in Interactive Data Science Notebooks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.09248/) (2022)
- [ResearchRubrics: A Benchmark of Prompts and Rubrics For Evaluating Deep Research Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.07685/) (2025)
- [BLADE: Benchmarking Language Model Agents for Data-Driven Science](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.09667/) (2024)
- [Mind2Web 2: Evaluating Agentic Search with Agent-as-a-Judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.21506/) (2025)
- [DA-Code: Agent Data Science Code Generation Benchmark for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.07331/) (2024)
- [DABstep: Data Agent Benchmark for Multi-step Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.23719/) (2025)
- [KramaBench: A Benchmark for AI Systems on Data-to-Insight Pipelines over Data Lakes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.06541/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 23 of 23)

- [DeepResearchEval: An Automated Framework for Deep Research Task Construction and Agentic Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.09688/) (2026)
- [Agentic Environment Engineering for Large Language Models: A Survey of Environment Modeling, Synthesis, Evaluation, and Application](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.12191/) (2026)
- [Hunt Instead of Wait: Evaluating Deep Data Research on Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.02039/) (2026)
- [CODA-BENCH: Can Code Agents Handle Data-Intensive Tasks?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.15300/) (2026)
- [AgentGym2: Benchmarking Large Language Model Agents in De-Idealized Real-World Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.05174/) (2026)
- [AIDABench: AI Data Analytics Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.15636/) (2026)
- [Data Agents Under Attack: Vulnerabilities in LLM-Driven Analytical Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.08661/) (2026)
- [DataMagic: Transforming Tabular Data into Data Insight Video](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.20388/) (2026)
- [AlphaEval: Evaluating Agents in Production](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.12162/) (2026)
- [DV-World: Benchmarking Data Visualization Agents in Real-World Scenarios](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.25914/) (2026)
- [CDR-Bench: Evaluating Faithful Execution of Compositional, Order-Sensitive Data Refinement Recipes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.31435/) (2026)
- [QwenPaw-Data: Bridging Facts, Methodology, and Execution for Autonomous Enterprise Data Analytics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.11019/) (2026)
- [StartupBench: Benchmarking General-Purpose Agents on Market-Validated End-to-End Workflows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.17800/) (2026)
- [Terminal Agents: A Survey of AI Agents in Command-Line Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.20485/) (2026)
- [DataMagic: Authoring Data Videos through Declarative Multi-Agent Orchestration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.33403/) (2026)
- [Data Intelligence Agents: Interpreting, Modeling, and Querying Enterprise Data via Autonomous Coding Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.19319/) (2026)
- [AdaLens: Interactive Storyline for Monitoring and Steering Long-Running Agentic Data Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.17834/) (2026)
- [InsightChain: Optimized Chain-of-Insight Analytics for LLM-driven Data Visualization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.06438/) (2026)
- [Open Tabular Insight Extraction: Where Do We Stand, and Where Should We Go?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.07629/) (2026)
- [StateGuard: Analytical-State Management with Validity-Aware Intervention for Long-Horizon Data Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.34134/) (2026)
- [Towards Reliable AI Data Scientists: Data Agents with Workflow Harnesses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.35255/) (2026)
- [When Tools Silently Lie: Evaluating and Mitigating Blind Compliance in Tool-Augmented Data Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.37153/) (2026)
- [Argo-Bench: Evaluating Data Agents on Enterprise-Scale Workflows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.02122/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Real-world enterprise data intelligence workflows encompass data engineering that turns raw sources into analytical-ready tables and data analysis that convert those tables into decision-oriented insights. We introduce DAComp, a benchmark of 210 tasks that mirrors these complex workflows. Data engineering (DE) tasks require repository-level engineering on industrial schemas, including designing and building multi-stage SQL pipelines from scratch and evolving existing systems under evolving requirements. Data analysis (DA) tasks pose open-ended business problems that demand strategic planning, exploratory analysis through iterative coding, interpretation of intermediate results, and the synthesis of actionable recommendations. Engineering tasks are scored through execution-based, multi-metric evaluation. Open-ended tasks are assessed by a reliable, experimentally validated LLM-judge, which is guided by hierarchical, meticulously crafted rubrics. Our experiments reveal that even state-of-the-art agents falter on DAComp. Performance on DE tasks is particularly low, with success rates under 20%, exposing a critical bottleneck in holistic pipeline orchestration, not merely code generation. Scores on DA tasks also average below 40%, highlighting profound deficiencies in open-ended reasoning and demonstrating that engineering and analysis are distinct capabilities. By clearly diagnosing these limitations, DAComp provides a rigorous and realistic testbed to drive the development of truly capable autonomous data agents for enterprise settings. Our data and code are available at https://da-comp.github.io