# Rethinking AI Evaluation in Education: The TEACH-AI Framework and Benchmark for Generative AI Assistants

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.04107 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.04107/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 32 of its 148 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 28 Nov 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 32)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6572/) (2014)
- [On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07258/) (2021)
- [Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10045/) (2019)
- [A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.01933/) (2018)
- [Aligning AI With Shared Human Values](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.02275/) (2020)
- [AI and the Everything in the Whole Wide World Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.15366/) (2021)
- [Deep Knowledge Tracing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.05908/) (2015)
- [TheAgentCompany: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Consequential Real World Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.14161/) (2024)
- [From Anecdotal Evidence to Quantitative Evaluation Methods: A Systematic Review on Evaluating Explainable AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.08164/) (2022)
- [Opportunities and Challenges in Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11371/) (2020)
- [Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.02478/) (2020)
- [AgentClinic: a multimodal agent benchmark to evaluate AI in simulated clinical environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.07960/) (2024)
- [Autonomous Evaluation and Refinement of Digital Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.06474/) (2024)
- [Benchmarking and Survey of Explanation Methods for Black Box Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.13076/) (2021)
- [Watch-And-Help: A Challenge for Social Perception and Human-AI Collaboration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.09890/) (2020)
- [BetterBench: Assessing AI Benchmarks, Uncovering Issues, and Establishing Best Practices](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.12990/) (2024)
- ['It's Reducing a Human Being to a Percentage'; Perceptions of Justice in Algorithmic Decisions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.10408/) (2018)
- [The AI Teacher Test: Measuring the Pedagogical Ability of Blender and GPT-3 in Educational Dialogues](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.07540/) (2022)
- [Towards Responsible Development of Generative AI for Education: An Evaluation-Driven Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.12687/) (2024)
- [ALI-Agent: Assessing LLMs' Alignment with Human Values via Agent-based Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.14125/) (2024)
- [Benchmarking Agentic Workflow Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.07869/) (2024)
- [ComfyBench: Benchmarking LLM-based Agents in ComfyUI for Autonomously Designing Collaborative AI Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.01392/) (2024)
- [Seeing Like a Toolkit: How Toolkits Envision the Work of AI Ethics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.08792/) (2022)
- [Using Generative AI and Multi-Agents to Provide Automatic Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.07407/) (2024)
- [Generative AI for Education (GAIED): Advances, Opportunities, and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01580/) (2024)
- [Improving Student Learning with Hybrid Human-AI Tutoring: A Three-Study Quasi-Experimental Investigation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.11274/) (2023)
- ["My Grade is Wrong!": A Contestable AI Framework for Interactive Feedback in Evaluating Student Essays](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.07453/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

As generative artificial intelligence (AI) continues to transform education, most existing AI evaluations rely primarily on technical performance metrics such as accuracy or task efficiency while overlooking human identity, learner agency, contextual learning processes, and ethical considerations. In this paper, we present TEACH-AI (Trustworthy and Effective AI Classroom Heuristics), a domain-independent, pedagogically grounded, and stakeholder-aligned framework with measurable indicators and a practical toolkit for guiding the design, development, and evaluation of generative AI systems in educational contexts. Built on an extensive literature review and synthesis, the ten-component assessment framework and toolkit checklist provide a foundation for scalable, value-aligned AI evaluation in education. TEACH-AI rethinks "evaluation" through sociotechnical, educational, theoretical, and applied lenses, engaging designers, developers, researchers, and policymakers across AI and education. Our work invites the community to reconsider what constructs "effective" AI in education and to design model evaluation approaches that promote co-creation, inclusivity, and long-term human, social, and educational impact.