# Dual-Robust Cross-Domain Offline Reinforcement Learning Against Dynamics Shifts

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.02486 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.02486/

## Key facts

- Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Offline RL algorithms, one of 13 directions in Offline RL and imitation learning from data.
- Builds on 57 of its 80 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 2 Dec 2025.

## Placed in

- Offline RL and imitation learning from data / [Offline RL algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/offlinerl/offline-rl-algorithms/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 57)

- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actor](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.01290/) (2018)
- [Offline Reinforcement Learning: Tutorial, Review, and Perspectives on Open Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.01643/) (2020)
- [Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.04779/) (2020)
- [D4RL: Datasets for Deep Data-Driven Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.07219/) (2020)
- [Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.06169/) (2021)
- [Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning without Exploration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.02900/) (2018)
- [A Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.06860/) (2021)
- [Stabilizing Off-Policy Q-Learning via Bootstrapping Error Reduction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.00949/) (2019)
- [When to Trust Your Model: Model-Based Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.08253/) (2019)
- [MOPO: Model-based Offline Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.13239/) (2020)
- [COMBO: Conservative Offline Model-Based Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.08363/) (2021)
- [Is Pessimism Provably Efficient for Offline RL?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.15085/) (2020)
- [Imitation from Observation: Learning to Imitate Behaviors from Raw Video via Context Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.03374/) (2017)
- [Extreme Q-Learning: MaxEnt RL without Entropy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.02328/) (2023)
- [Offline RL with No OOD Actions: In-Sample Learning via Implicit Value Regularization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.15810/) (2023)
- [Mildly Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.04745/) (2022)
- [Off-Dynamics Reinforcement Learning: Training for Transfer with Domain Classifiers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.13916/) (2020)
- [Distributionally Robust Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning with Near-Optimal Sample Complexity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.05767/) (2022)
- [RORL: Robust Offline Reinforcement Learning via Conservative Smoothing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.02829/) (2022)
- [When to Trust Your Simulator: Dynamics-Aware Hybrid Offline-and-Online Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.13464/) (2022)
- [Corruption-Robust Offline Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.06630/) (2021)
- [Learning Cross-Domain Correspondence for Control with Dynamics Cycle-Consistency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.09811/) (2020)
- [DARA: Dynamics-Aware Reward Augmentation in Offline Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.06662/) (2022)
- [What is Essential for Unseen Goal Generalization of Offline Goal-conditioned RL?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18882/) (2023)
- [Policy Regularization with Dataset Constraint for Offline Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.06569/) (2023)
- [Cross-Domain Policy Adaptation via Value-Guided Data Filtering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.17625/) (2023)
- [Corruption-Robust Offline Reinforcement Learning with General Function Approximation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.14550/) (2023)
- [Robust Policy Gradient against Strong Data Corruption](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.05800/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Model-based Offline RL via Robust Value-Aware Model Learning with Implicitly Differentiable Adaptive Weighting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.08118/) (2026)
- [Bridging Domain Gaps with Target-Aligned Generation for Offline Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.13054/) (2026)
- [Target-Aligned Bellman Backup for Cross-domain Offline Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.22376/) (2026)
- [Unifying Value Alignment and Assignment in Cross-Domain Offline Reinforcement Learning with Heterogeneous Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.24862/) (2026)
- [Breaking the Epistemic Trap: Active Perception Under Compound Uncertainty](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.26627/) (2026)
- [Adaptive Safety Filtering for Frozen ACC Policies via Conformal Residual Calibration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.35415/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Single-domain offline reinforcement learning (RL) often suffers from limited data coverage, while cross-domain offline RL handles this issue by leveraging additional data from other domains with dynamics shifts. However, existing studies primarily focus on train-time robustness (handling dynamics shifts from training data), neglecting the test-time robustness against dynamics perturbations when deployed in practical scenarios. In this paper, we investigate dual (both train-time and test-time) robustness against dynamics shifts in cross-domain offline RL. We first empirically show that the policy trained with cross-domain offline RL exhibits fragility under dynamics perturbations during evaluation, particularly when target domain data is limited. To address this, we introduce a novel robust cross-domain Bellman (RCB) operator, which enhances test-time robustness against dynamics perturbations while staying conservative to the out-of-distribution dynamics transitions, thus guaranteeing the train-time robustness. To further counteract potential value overestimation or underestimation caused by the RCB operator, we introduce two techniques, the dynamic value penalty and the Huber loss, into our framework, resulting in the practical Dual-RObust Cross-domain Offline RL (DROCO) algorithm. Extensive empirical results across various dynamics shift scenarios show that DROCO outperforms strong baselines and exhibits enhanced robustness to dynamics perturbations.