# Reasoning Path and Latent State Analysis for Multi-view Visual Spatial Reasoning: A Cognitive Science Perspective

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.02340 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.02340/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 39 of its 59 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 2 Dec 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Spatial and embodied reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/spatial-and-embodied-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 39)

- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13923/) (2025)
- [Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.06261/) (2025)
- [LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.03326/) (2024)
- [Expanding Performance Boundaries of Open-Source Multimodal Models with Model, Data, and Test-Time Scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.05271/) (2024)
- [Video-LLaVA: Learning United Visual Representation by Alignment Before Projection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.10122/) (2023)
- [SpatialVLM: Endowing Vision-Language Models with Spatial Reasoning Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.12168/) (2024)
- [Thinking in Space: How Multimodal Large Language Models See, Remember, and Recall Spaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.14171/) (2024)
- [Room-Across-Room: Multilingual Vision-and-Language Navigation with Dense Spatiotemporal Grounding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.07954/) (2020)
- [Embodied Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.11543/) (2017)
- [Visual Spatial Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.00363/) (2022)
- [Judging the Judges: A Systematic Study of Position Bias in LLM-as-a-Judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.07791/) (2024)
- [Semantic Entropy Probes: Robust and Cheap Hallucination Detection in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.15927/) (2024)
- [What's "up" with vision-language models? Investigating their struggle with spatial reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.19785/) (2023)
- [Spatial-MLLM: Boosting MLLM Capabilities in Visual-based Spatial Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.23747/) (2025)
- [MMSI-Bench: A Benchmark for Multi-Image Spatial Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.23764/) (2025)
- [VLM-3R: Vision-Language Models Augmented with Instruction-Aligned 3D Reconstruction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.20279/) (2025)
- [Reasoning Models Know When They're Right: Probing Hidden States for Self-Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.05419/) (2025)
- [Infinigen Indoors: Photorealistic Indoor Scenes using Procedural Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11824/) (2024)
- [Learning from Videos for 3D World: Enhancing MLLMs with 3D Vision Geometry Priors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.24625/) (2025)
- [ViewSpatial-Bench: Evaluating Multi-perspective Spatial Localization in Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.21500/) (2025)
- [OmniSpatial: Towards Comprehensive Spatial Reasoning Benchmark for Vision Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.03135/) (2025)
- [LayoutVLM: Differentiable Optimization of 3D Layout via Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.02193/) (2024)
- [MindCube: Spatial Mental Modeling from Limited Views](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.21458/) (2025)
- [Multi-Target Embodied Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.04686/) (2019)
- [On Measuring Faithfulness or Self-consistency of Natural Language Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.07466/) (2023)
- [V-STaR: Benchmarking Video-LLMs on Video Spatio-Temporal Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.11495/) (2025)
- [Spatial Reasoning with Vision-Language Models in Ego-Centric Multi-View Scenes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.06266/) (2025)
- [3D Concept Learning and Reasoning from Multi-View Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11327/) (2023)
- [SpatialPIN: Enhancing Spatial Reasoning Capabilities of Vision-Language Models through Prompting and Interacting 3D Priors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.13438/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [The Latent Space: Foundation, Evolution, Mechanism, Ability, and Outlook](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.02029/) (2026)
- [How Do LLMs and VLMs Understand Viewpoint Rotation Without Vision? An Interpretability Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.15294/) (2026)
- [MV-STRIDE: Enabling MLLMs to Master Multi-View Spatial Reasoning via Hierarchical Capability Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.07258/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Spatial reasoning is a core aspect of human intelligence that allows perception, inference and planning in 3D environments. However, current vision-language models (VLMs) struggle to maintain geometric coherence and cross-view consistency for spatial reasoning in multi-view settings. We attribute this gap to the lack of fine-grained benchmarks that isolate multi-view reasoning from single-view perception and temporal factors. To address this, we present ReMindView-Bench, a cognitively grounded benchmark for evaluating how VLMs construct, align and maintain spatial mental models across complementary viewpoints. ReMindView-Bench systematically varies viewpoint spatial pattern and query type to probe key factors of spatial cognition. Evaluations of 15 current VLMs reveals consistent failures in cross-view alignment and perspective-taking in multi-view spatial reasoning, motivating deeper analysis on the reasoning process. Explicit phase-wise analysis using LLM-as-a-judge and self-consistency prompting shows that VLMs perform well on in-frame perception but degrade sharply when integrating information across views. Implicit analysis, including linear probing and entropy dynamics, further show progressive loss of task-relevant information and uncertainty separation between correct and incorrect trajectories. These results provide a cognitively grounded diagnosis of VLM spatial reasoning and reveal how multi-view spatial mental models are formed, degraded and destabilized across reasoning phases. The ReMindView-Bench benchmark is available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/Xue0823/ReMindView-Bench, and the source codes of benchmark construction and VLM reasoning analysis are available at https://github.com/pittisl/ReMindView-Bench.