# Guardian: Detecting Robotic Planning and Execution Errors with Vision-Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.01946 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.01946/

## Key facts

- Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Embodied and 3D vision-language models, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 53 of its 74 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 Dec 2025.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [Embodied and 3D vision-language models](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/embodied-and-3d-vision-language-models/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 53)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09685/) (2021)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Visual Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.08485/) (2023)
- [GPT-4o System Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.21276/) (2024)
- [Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.14198/) (2022)
- [π0: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.24164/) (2024)
- [InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.10479/) (2025)
- [π0.5: a Vision-Language-Action Model with Open-World Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.16054/) (2025)
- [A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.05232/) (2023)
- [Language Models as Zero-Shot Planners: Extracting Actionable Knowledge for Embodied Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.07207/) (2022)
- [DROID: A Large-Scale In-The-Wild Robot Manipulation Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.12945/) (2024)
- [RLBench: The Robot Learning Benchmark & Learning Environment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.12271/) (2019)
- [BridgeData V2: A Dataset for Robot Learning at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.12952/) (2023)
- [Perceiver-Actor: A Multi-Task Transformer for Robotic Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.05451/) (2022)
- [Sim-to-Real Transfer in Deep Reinforcement Learning for Robotics: a Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.13303/) (2020)
- [AgiBot World Colosseo: A Large-scale Manipulation Platform for Scalable and Intelligent Embodied Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.06669/) (2025)
- [Robotic Control via Embodied Chain-of-Thought Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.08693/) (2024)
- [Zero-Shot Robotic Manipulation with Pretrained Image-Editing Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.10639/) (2023)
- [RVT: Robotic View Transformer for 3D Object Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.14896/) (2023)
- [REFLECT: Summarizing Robot Experiences for Failure Explanation and Correction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.15724/) (2023)
- [RoboMIND: Benchmark on Multi-embodiment Intelligence Normative Data for Robot Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.13877/) (2024)
- [Ctrl-World: A Controllable Generative World Model for Robot Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.10125/) (2025)
- [Cosmos-Reason1: From Physical Common Sense To Embodied Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.15558/) (2025)
- [A Review of Robot Learning for Manipulation: Challenges, Representations, and Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.03146/) (2019)
- [Vision-Language Models as Success Detectors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.07280/) (2023)
- [Improve Vision Language Model Chain-of-thought Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.16198/) (2024)
- [THE COLOSSEUM: A Benchmark for Evaluating Generalization for Robotic Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.08191/) (2024)
- [AHA: A Vision-Language-Model for Detecting and Reasoning Over Failures in Robotic Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.00371/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [Learning Actionable Manipulation Recovery via Counterfactual Failure Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.13528/) (2026)
- [Embodied-R1.5: Evolving Physical Intelligence via Embodied Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.11324/) (2026)
- [Data Pyramid for Embodied Manipulation: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.24744/) (2026)
- [SAIL: Test-Time Scaling for In-Context Imitation Learning with VLM](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.08269/) (2026)
- [DenseReward: Dense Reward Learning via Failure Synthesis for Robotic Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.13033/) (2026)
- [STeP: Signal Temporal Logic for Precise Specifications for Action Generation with Vision Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.18580/) (2026)
- [When Video Misreads: Closed-Loop Distillation of Reading Heuristics for Exploratory Manipulation Trace QA](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.08542/) (2026)
- [FailBench: How Reliable are VLMs at Judging Robot Task Success?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.03611/) (2026)
- [Where Success Breaks: Failure-Boundary Learning for Robust Vision-Language-Action Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.06114/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Robust robotic manipulation requires reliable failure detection and recovery. Although recent Vision-Language Models (VLMs) show promise in robot failure detection, their generalization is severely limited by the scarcity and narrow coverage of failure data. To address this bottleneck, we propose an automatic framework for generating diverse robotic planning and execution failures across both simulated and real-world environments. Our approach perturbs successful manipulation trajectories to synthesize failures that reflect realistic failure distributions, and leverages VLMs to produce structured step-by-step reasoning traces. This yields GuardianFail-36k, a large-scale failure reasoning dataset built upon the RLBench simulator and the BridgeDataV2 real-robot dataset. Using GuardianFail-36k, we train Guardian, a multi-view reasoning VLM for unified planning and execution verification. Guardian achieves state-of-the-art performance on three unseen real-world benchmarks: RoboFail, RoboVQA, and our newly introduced UR5-Fail. When integrated with a state-of-the-art LLM-based manipulation policy, it consistently boosts task success rates in both simulation and real-world deployment. These results demonstrate that scaling high-quality failure reasoning data is critical for improving generalization in robotic failure detection. Code, Data, and Models are available at https://www.di.ens.fr/willow/research/guardian/.