# An Optimized Machine Learning Classifier for Detecting Fake Reviews Using Extracted Features

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.21716 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.21716/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 10 of its 66 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 19 Nov 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.02754/) (2016)
- [Defending Against Neural Fake News](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.12616/) (2019)
- [GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.04043/) (2019)
- [Imbalanced-learn: A Python Toolbox to Tackle the Curse of Imbalanced Datasets in Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.06570/) (2016)
- [A Privacy-Preserving Outsourced Data Model in Cloud Environment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.13542/) (2022)
- [A Differential Approach for Data and Classification Service based Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning Model in Cloud Environment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10177/) (2022)
- [A Privacy-Preserving Model based on Differential Approach for Sensitive Data in Cloud Environment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.12534/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

It is well known that fraudulent reviews cast doubt on the legitimacy and dependability of online purchases. The most recent development that leads customers towards darkness is the appearance of human reviews in computer-generated (CG) ones. In this work, we present an advanced machine-learning-based system that analyses these reviews produced by AI with remarkable precision. Our method integrates advanced text preprocessing, multi-modal feature extraction, Harris Hawks Optimization (HHO) for feature selection, and a stacking ensemble classifier. We implemented this methodology on a public dataset of 40,432 Original (OR) and Computer-Generated (CG) reviews. From an initial set of 13,539 features, HHO selected the most applicable 1,368 features, achieving an 89.9% dimensionality reduction. Our final stacking model achieved 95.40% accuracy, 92.81% precision, 95.01% recall, and a 93.90% F1-Score, which demonstrates that the combination of ensemble learning and bio-inspired optimisation is an effective method for machine-generated text recognition. Because large-scale review analytics commonly run on cloud platforms, privacy-preserving techniques such as differential approaches and secure outsourcing are essential to protect user data in these systems.
