# REFLEX: Self-Refining Explainable Fact-Checking via Verdict-Anchored Style Control

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.20233 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.20233/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 53 of its 70 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 25 Nov 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 53)

- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.05232/) (2023)
- [A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.15594/) (2024)
- [Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.03341/) (2023)
- [What Makes Good In-Context Examples for GPT-3?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.06804/) (2021)
- [Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08786/) (2021)
- [Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Prompting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.04388/) (2023)
- [LIMA: Less Is More for Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.11206/) (2023)
- [Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Addition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.06681/) (2023)
- [Diffusion-LM Improves Controllable Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.14217/) (2022)
- [Plug and Play Language Models: A Simple Approach to Controlled Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.02164/) (2019)
- [Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.03827/) (2022)
- [Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.03685/) (2020)
- [Emergent World Representations: Exploring a Sequence Model Trained on a Synthetic Task](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.13382/) (2022)
- [A Survey on Automated Fact-Checking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.11896/) (2021)
- [Cognitive Behaviors that Enable Self-Improving Reasoners, or, Four Habits of Highly Effective STaRs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.01307/) (2025)
- [Character-LLM: A Trainable Agent for Role-Playing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.10158/) (2023)
- [Does Fine-Tuning LLMs on New Knowledge Encourage Hallucinations?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.05904/) (2024)
- [Get Your Vitamin C! Robust Fact Verification with Contrastive Evidence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.08541/) (2021)
- [Better Zero-Shot Reasoning with Role-Play Prompting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.07702/) (2023)
- [Generated Knowledge Prompting for Commonsense Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.08387/) (2021)
- [Can LLM-Generated Misinformation Be Detected?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.13788/) (2023)
- [Automatic Detection of Fake News](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.07104/) (2017)
- [AVeriTeC: A Dataset for Real-world Claim Verification with Evidence from the Web](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13117/) (2023)
- [Taken out of context: On measuring situational awareness in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.00667/) (2023)
- [Inspecting and Editing Knowledge Representations in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.00740/) (2023)
- [Transformer visualization via dictionary learning: contextualized embedding as a linear superposition of transformer factors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.15949/) (2021)
- [Faithfulness Tests for Natural Language Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18029/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Diagnosing LLM Arbitration Behavior over Pre-evidence Epistemic States in RAG-based Fact-Checking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.01120/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The prevalence of fake news on social media demands automated fact-checking systems to provide accurate verdicts with faithful explanations. However, existing large language model (LLM)-based approaches ignore deceptive misinformation styles in LLM-generated explanations, resulting in unfaithful rationales that can mislead human judgments. They rely heavily on external knowledge sources, introducing hallucinations and even high latency that undermine reliability and responsiveness, which is crucial for real-time use. To address these challenges, we propose REason-guided Fact-checking with Latent EXplanations (REFLEX), a self-refining paradigm that explicitly controls reasoning style anchored on verdict. REFLEX utilizes self-disagreement veracity signals between the backbone model and its fine-tuned variant to construct steering vectors, naturally disentangling fact from style. Experiments on the real-world dataset show REFLEX achieves state-of-the-art performance under LLaMA-series models with only 465 self-refined samples. Moreover, owing to its transferability, REFLEX yields up to a 7.54% gain on in-the-wild data. Our results further demonstrate that our method effectively mitigates faithful hallucination, thereby guiding the model toward more accurate verdicts than previous works in explainable fact-checking.